Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kerner
Kerner
2 years ago

It is.

The more storage space, the more clusters.

The more clusters the more space,
to simultaneously process data sets.

If you don’t remember,
because they are microseconds.

In the case of memory sizes below 500GB, this has an effect,
if longer data columns are processed.

In the case of memory sizes above 2TB, this is again relative,
here the processor is limited.

More important is good cooling and the PCIe generation.

Where from PCIe5, then the CPU controller is limited.

You can remember that,

with NVMe directly with the CPU,

and SATA-SSD via the Southbridge

are connected.

But that’s only fractions of seconds.

Other factors limit downloads.

Hansi

1
kmkcl
kmkcl
2 years ago

No, it’s more technology making a difference. QLC (Quad Level Cell) is more favourable than SLC (Single Level Cell), MLC (Multi Level Cell), TLC (Triple Level Cell), but not so good… on the one hand, from the durability point of view, on the other hand, from performance founders. This is just an example, there are still different cache behaviors, etc…

1
IceT1701
IceT1701
2 years ago

There is a measurable relationship between size and performance. The bigger the faster. Effectively, however, it must be said that the difference is more noticeable at 128GB and also at 256GB. For sizes above 500, the performance gain is significantly lower and negligible.

1