Sigma 150-600mm Objektiv für Fotos in der Dämmerung?
Ich habe eine Canon Eos 80D mit einem Canon RF 70-300mm II Usm Objektiv. Allerdings hat mir dieses zu wenig Brennweite. Da das Sigma 150-600mm Contemporary schwache Lichtstärke aufweist, hader ich allerdings mit der Anschaffung dessen.
You have to choose between zoom range or light intensity. Both do not exist, except you can have €14,000 for a Canon EF 600mm 4.0 L IS III USM. Even for the first version you pay well and like to use over 3000€. And that’s only 1 1⁄3 Blends light stronger than f/6.3. So halve the difference of about 1x ISO.
The only really light-strength lens you will find goes only up to 200mm. That would be the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8, the latest version III costs so ca. 1200-1300€ and then have even less zoom, where you can buckle a 2x teleconverter (+300€) below and then have a 140-400mm f/5.6. So not much lighter again.
Thus, a decision will ultimately be made between 100-400mm II Usm and 150-600mm Sigma. Why would you advise me to photograph Elche?
You should know what focal length is enough for yourself, I don’t know how far you’re coming with your existing 300mm. At a 600mm, the elk would be about twice as big on the picture.
Only 1/3 aperture. You can also try this on your 300mm.
But how big is the difference between 5.6f and 6.3f?
The difference to the Canon RF 70-300 is not too big. In twilight it can be that you have to adjust the ISO sensitivity higher (ISO 400) to get usable exposure times.
If you can get the Sigma cheap, you should hit. A cheaper price would be about 400 to 500 euros.
Okay, thank you.
Think you should try it. F5-6.3 is absolutely normal for such focal lengths. At 600 mm you get maximum F4, for about 14,000 €.