Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
10 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
aalbtraum, UserMod Light

No. Note that manipulation attempts can be detected and do not have a positive effect on the further course.

Maybe interesting: https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/hair analysis/

aXXLJ
1 year ago

No, there are no agents with effectiveness assurance.

WalterMatern
1 year ago

The only possibility exists Waxing, no hair no proof.

However, it must also be done carefully in the eyebrows, for example, evidence can be found.

aXXLJ
1 year ago
Reply to  WalterMatern

Sham and armpit hairs, as well as chest or back hairs, are suitable for detection. If necessary, a forensic can also detect drug use with footnails or fingernails.

WalterMatern
1 year ago
Reply to  aXXLJ

Sham and armpit hairs, as well as chest or back hairs, are suitable for detection.

.

The only possibility existsWaxing,no hair no proof.

But must be done carefully. . .

What about the sentences you didn’t understand?

If necessary, a forensic can also detect drug use with footnails or fingernails.

Let everything be cut down to such an extent that nothing remains for proof.

aXXLJ
1 year ago

“Man” has nothing to prove to you. Incidentally, the testing authority is free to provide laboratory analyses of blood and/or urine.

WalterMatern
1 year ago

That I didn’t do that long ago because I liked it that way, I have to prove.

aXXLJ
1 year ago

You don’t seem to have understood that a whole body dehairing is designed as a manipulation attempt on the occasion of an announced drug testing.

xXHushXx
1 year ago

Detection is taken directly from the hair not superficially from the hair. The only thing that would help would be to wipe off all hair completely.

sleepingbeautyy
1 year ago

No.