Sensations-Sucht–Problematisch?
Ist es problematisch, dass Menschen häufig auf schlimme, sensationelle, oder intensiv emotionale Inhalte suchen, die sich auf die Realität beziehen? Manchmal führt dies beim True-Crime zur Glorifikation solcher Straftäter und einem falschen Bild, das den Horror der Realität bedeckt. Sollte das heißen, dass man eher Unterhaltung in Form von fiktioneller Narrative suchen sollte, statt realen Ereignissen? Weil Menschen dann denken, sie müssen reale Pranks, die beinahe ans Illegale schwanken, ausführen, um die gewünschten Aufrufe zu erhalten? Was denkt Ihr dazu?
(1 votes)
Loading...
true crime can help to create a sense of reality and the dark side of society without distorting the layers… it allows to deal with the psychological and social aspects of crime and often shows how our justice system works… as long as you consciously and respectfully deal with the themes, it can provide a real value and not only show the terribleness, but can also teach past mistakes how such
Right. However, I find the sensation that comes with it unnecessary. This can lead to the trivialization of the less extreme deeds and less empathy for those whose cases do not sound very sensational.
I find true crime few bad or sensational thrills than some videos on tiktok, or youtube…I like to look true crime and am very empathic, that has not changed in all the years…abstuvaccination is rather unlikely in true crime because most people consider the incidents not as blosse entertainment, but are really focused on the sacrifices and the after-treating details…
Better deliberately spread nonsense than completely not to check the question and land next to it.
Yeah, that’s the point. Well, it doesn’t really matter whether it’s the truth or not. Come on, write on. I’m always ready, beloved oh, dear king. Let me venerate you and write words and eat children. Children’s crucible natural, hehe
it doesn’t matter to get involved in a conversation with someone who, instead of following a clear line, only distracts and loses himself in unrelated remarks… your reaction only shows that you are more about playing games and provoking emotions than actually being constructive… instead of really going to the point, you can try crimply to lower the level of your own, what is really in it?
“These overcrowded and unrelated attacks only show you that this thema in the core might not be so important, right?” Yeah, because you distracted me all the time. Boy what that. You go all the time to the same level as me. Do something right, constructive. Lol, I’m serious now.
Seems like you’ve already given yourself the answer… if your goal is to simply spread nonsense and drag the conversation into the ridiculous, without contributing anything constructively, you should ask yourself why you’re even allowing yourself to… such overcrowded and unrelated attacks only show you that this thema in the core might not be so important, right?
You didn’t even deal with my previous comment and listed completely unrelated arguments and ask my to ignore. That’s what I call constructive. Of course I understand what you mean. It’s just that I don’t want to put myself in your worthless position, because your existence is so small. I don’t want your extremely bad spelling to affect me either. I want to see a cat. After that I see: Who was Ardyn again? This question is exactly 5 minutes after I licked away. Lol. Haha. Okay, I’m sorry, honey. I’ll like you and have it intimately with you? Sand eat with a clowns-fratze. Nice, haha, right?
you speak of “senseless contests” and “refusing the facts” while you yourself here are groundlessly aggressively reaping and doing exactly what you criticize… I understand that this thema is important to you, but maybe you should consider whether your demand and your ton really contribute to leading a constructive discussion…
Listen. This is not a competition. This is not an argument or argument. I just asked if it’s bad–generell, not specifically just on True-Crime– that media, films, etc. are often sensational and what effects could arise. You’ve listed your experiences. I didn’t ask for that. And also not ONLY True Crime. Of course, the topic of “sensational content” and “glorification of offenders” is relevant. It’s not just about your experience, you know? It is a fact that some are just negative and problematic. I also don’t want to attack your beloved True-Crime interests, but I want to address a problem that could potentially be solved, not a denial of the facts. If there is not, I would not have mentioned it first. You have to understand that, and I’d be grateful if we leave those damn, meaningless fighters that go so much on my sack, you know?
you asked…
Okay. Okay. O-K-A-Y.
That’s human. It is only used, for example, by media. Messages are more clicked when the title sounds particularly dramatic, exciting or sensational.
Leads to inflating and exaggerating everything
If the viewers constantly meet extreme content, this will eventually become boring. Then these contributions become extreme and extreme …