Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
25 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
WeHaveTheAnswer
1 year ago

That doesn’t matter, after all, you can freely determine the timestamp of the mail.

LUKEars
1 year ago

then the recipient thinks you turned on the clock…

or should he tell the email program that it should get the email on the way at a certain time?

WeHaveTheAnswer
1 year ago
Reply to  LUKEars

If I know my employer will come to the office at 7:00, I’ll put the timestamp at 6:50. And he doesn’t think I turned the clock. Then he thinks I sent the mail at 6:50 🙂 It can be so easy.

WeHaveTheAnswer
1 year ago

Yeah, that’s how you run a mail server inefficiently. As already said, the subject is over. I’m sure I won’t explain the basics to you, so you can read yourself.

LUKEars
1 year ago

we do not make a grey listing… we refuse emails from well-known spam spins and dialup IPs…

WeHaveTheAnswer
1 year ago

Then there’s something wrong with you. Thus, anyone who hasn’t sent a mail to you in the last X weeks/months will automatically land in the Greylisting and your mail server will generally accept its email only 30 minutes (or more) delay. IT should be a more sensible solution.

LUKEars
1 year ago

with us not… with us in the company is even decisive for the order in which the emails are placed in the database…. an entry stamp just…. as in the past with the paper post….

WeHaveTheAnswer
1 year ago

Also, the employer will never notice. This is so simple:) By the way, the timestamp of the receiving server is completely nothing-pronounced, you know that?

LUKEars
1 year ago

is just a click… and who cares about it just needs to look right, otherwise he never notices…

WeHaveTheAnswer
1 year ago

Not shown in the mail client and I doubt very strongly that the Otto-Normal consumer looks at the source of each email individually 🙂

LUKEars
1 year ago

but the receiving server also puts a timestamp in the email, which is then in the past…

D3b30
1 year ago

Actually, it doesn’t matter.

csor77
1 year ago

Someone rarely pays attention to time.

ChrisCat1, UserMod Light

If you send the email to someone who pays attention to the time, it can potentially get weird.
But it doesn’t matter to many people or just don’t pay attention to the time of the email.

However, some email programs/providers have a “Later Send/Send Plan” function, so you can write the email now, but this will only be sent at a fixed time.
If you’re worried, you can use a function like that.

WeHaveTheAnswer
1 year ago

Or you simply set the system clock to the time that the receiver should display as a transmission time. So why such circumstances?

LUKEars
1 year ago

because this is quite noticeable… then you are the funny night-active with broken system time…. so your clock is ticking right… because the reception is also logged with time stamp….

LUKEars
1 year ago

dange for mainsplainen… lol

WeHaveTheAnswer
1 year ago

Let’s get stuck, you’re missing any basic knowledge, and that’s why I’m not staying with you. Find out about Greyelistung and other spam protection measures. It is inconsistent that a conventional mail client indicates the sending time of the mail and not the receiving time because it is absolutely nothing-pronounced and therefore the subject is already finished 🙂

the sender is known…

Best example 🙂 The sender can be known to you or your mail client, it has nothing to do with the server. After all, he deletes the white list regularly.

And now a lot of fun to fantasize 🙂

LUKEars
1 year ago

ey… what are you talking about?

  1. the sender is known…
  2. the email would then still be sent to…
  3. How do you explain that our company server usually needs significantly less than one minute to provide ne eMail?
WeHaveTheAnswer
1 year ago

If you send me an e-mail, you will of course first land on the gray list of my mail server. Your mail will be rejected in any case, called simple spam protection 🙂 Only if your server tries to deliver the same mail to me at least X times in a minimum time interval of Y minutes, it is also accepted by the receiving server and then gets the timestamp of the acceptance time. By the way, this is a normal procedure and absolutely every professionally operated mail server works with Greyelisting. Therefore, the timestamp of the reception is completely irrelevant and non-essential.

LUKEars
1 year ago

hä? Greylisting? If the reception stamp is hours before the broadcasting stamp, I assume that the sender is too stupid to use a correct watch… I wouldn’t even say that.

WeHaveTheAnswer
1 year ago

The fact that the timestamp of the reception is absolutely nothing-pronounced, only because of greyelisting, should be known to you 🙂

LUKEars
1 year ago

If I look at the time of transmission, I’ll look at all time stamps….

WeHaveTheAnswer
1 year ago

The mail client shows the timestamp of the sending server. When the recipient calls the mail from his server does not matter. And of course this is not obvious.

Peppie85
1 year ago

usually not. unless it becomes funny, for example, that you do not send during the day but only at night or the workman gets angry because you seem tired during the day.