Sehtest Fahrschule Betrug?
Hallo ich muss einen Sehtest für die Fahrschule machen. Ich habe eine Brille mit der Stärke – 1,75 Dipotrine (Kurzsichtig).
Aber ich will nicht das dies in meinem Führerschein steht. Uch werde den Sehtest wahrscheinlich nicht bestehen, da ich ja wie gesagt -1,75 Dioptrien habe.
Wäre es Betrug oder wäre es strafbar, wenn ich zu dem Sehtest gehen würde mit Kontaklinsen drin sodass ich normal sehen kann. Und halt sage das ich keine Brille brauche. Er den Sehtest mit mir macht und mir die Bescheinigung mitgeteilt das ich keine Brille brauche.
Im Straßenverkehr werde ich natürlich trotzdem immer eine Brille anziehen.
(4 votes)
Loading...
I wouldn’t cheat. Since you need the glasses to drive anyway, otherwise it becomes limitless, it doesn’t make any difference whether the hidden entry in your driving licence is.
Early in the gray lobe there was still the well visible entry “When driving suitable eyeglasses are to be worn. ‘
There’s a lot more inconspicuous.
Hi.
Contact lenses can be seen as an “unskilled” – the optician who earns his money. You don’t pull your pants on with pliers.
Ergo: the visual aid will be in the certificate. It’s hard to explain that you’re definitely not going to make friends with a “true experiment” with the optician.
Why?
It is a tiny little “01” on the back of the driver’s license, which you have to look for specifically to find it.
LG
Does he also recognize soft contact lenses?
Of course, what kind of world do you live in??
My goodness, then in your driver’s license what is necessary anyway: In the guidance of motor vehicles, suitable visual aids are to be carried – and in contrast to earlier, where the large stamp was in the driving licence in the visible form, this is only a small key entry today.
Contact lenses can be seen. They’ll see this at the visual test. I recognize them when I joinm a dentist and look into his eyes. He’s wearing them.
If you want to wear your glasses while driving, you can also care if it’s in the driver’s license.
And no, it doesn’t work. Contact lenses are visible even with a naked eye. Then you can see them right with the optics.
If you were cheating on the vision test (which is hardly possible), that would be stupid, negligent and in fact fraud. Your driver’s license would be invalid.
Obviously, you’re not responsible enough to run a car. Anyone who gives such a nonsense here should first grow up before he gets rid of humanity with a vehicle. That sounds very offensive now, but I’m just afraid of such people in traffic. How would you like to be betrayed yourself? Are you happy about that? Imagine a examiner will let you fall through by manipulating what, maybe just because he doesn’t like your face or he discovered when examining that you have contact lenses in the eyes, but on the note is crossed without visual aid. Then you’re the ass. In case of an accident, your own insurance can reclaim money from you because the fraud will definitely come out.
So, as I said, either become adult/responsible or forget the driver’s license.
You think you don’t see that you have lenses inside? In your WUNCHTRUM
How naive can you be
(As a matter of fact, the action can also lead to serious repercussions, e.g. that you can’t make your lobes all the time)
Why the effort if you will always wear glasses.
You can cost your driver’s license!
Really?
Depending on the traffic authority, you can first make a MPU whether you are able to drive appropriately!
What did you think? That you say, “well, don’t be so bad that you want to fuck us, here’s your lobe”?
Josh
🤧
If you’re going to wear glasses like that, why are you going to cheat? Just be honest, my goodness, what’s bad about it?
Why don’t you want this to be in your license?
And do you seriously think that an optician you’re doing a vision test doesn’t see that you have contact lenses in it? They’re not so stupid, they’re looking in your eyes…
You got glasses? Of course you’re doing the vision test with glasses!
You need glasses, don’t stand in the driver’s license!
Yes, there is Code 01.01
With contact lenses, the license code 01.02
But only if that was the case at the time of the acquisition.
I don’t know what you’re gonna have to do later if you need a glasses sometime with 70.
There’s nothing in my mind.
Where is that? I don’t see that? On the front or back?
It just stands 01
No, there’s no reading glasses in the car.
Some senseless, that something must be noted in the driver’s license. But in Germany the last shot must also be documented. What then leads to such questions of elephant new-red spectacles.
Grins : I got one for the neighborhood. But that probably doesn’t matter? I didn’t need one.
Maybe that’s why there’s nothing in me??
But I still find strange because it can always change whether you need glasses or not.
01 means glasses or contact lenses
01-01 means you can only wear glasses, no lenses
01-02 means you can only wear CL, no glasses.
01-02 and 01-01 are very, very rare.
Mine is just 01. I made the appearance in 1985, with glasses.
https://www.adac.de/verkehr/rund-um-den-fuehrschein/classes/schluesseldaten/
I made the vision test with glasses at the time and there’s only 01…
Only 01 is entered in the “practice” so that it is noted that you have to wear a visual aid, but you can freely decide between glasses/contact lens! Is there people who use glasses?
Hey, glasses?
No, no, no. In addition to people who, for professional reasons (bus drivers, for example), have to check their visual ability at intervals. It’ll be re-used for them.
On my back, under 12.
https://www.flvbw.de/fuehrerscheinclassen/schluesseldaten.html