Shouldn't you have the damage settled through fully comprehensive insurance?
A somewhat more complicated case (a mix of self-damage and vandalism). In any case, it's become a real scam, and I'm getting annoying and demanding calls from my authorized repair shop and insurance company. They claim something different every time. The story has been dragging on for ages, and now my insurance company has notified an adjuster.
I'm now leaning towards simply paying for the damage myself and having it repaired at a trusted garage. Could I still do that, or do I have to go through insurance?
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading...
If you’re considering paying for yourself, it’s probably keon very big damage. In this case, you should count very accurately whether you don’t pay for it yourself because if you use the full box you pay You still have the self-contribution and above all, your freedom class goes up that means you pay many years more contribution (except you have a tariff with damages which is then a lot more expensive from the outset)
You don’t have to, but I would recommend it to you.
For the next time: legal protection insurance, then give all to your lawyer and have rest 🙂
So you want me to go over the full-cass? But this is extremely complicated and is quite time-consuming. I have legal protection insurance.
Then I’d use it and give it to your lawyer, say that they’re stressing at the insurance and explain what you’ve done so far.