Similar Posts
Term paper on the Ottoman Empire, good sources?
I'm writing a paper on the Ottoman Empire, and I need good sources on Osman I or Mehmet, how they slowly established the Ottoman Empire. Does anyone know of any good sources?
Poem analysis Enjambemont?
Hello, Can someone explain to me what enjambemonts are based on the poem?
Are there different races/species of humans?
ByJoris556
Just like with animals. For example, an African elephant looks different from an Indian elephant. That's why they are different breeds. Likewise, a European looks different from an African. So, aren't they just different species? People from other parts of the world also look very different. Because of the racist racial theory of the past,…
The modern anatomical person comes from Africa. Nevertheless, you can’t just say the first people looked like Africans. Because “the Africans” don’t exist. People look very different in different regions of Africa, because living conditions are very different everywhere and therefore different adaptations have been made to the environment.
One assumes that the first anatomically modern people had a light brown skin color, comparable to the skin of the San members living in southern Africa. As protection against UV radiation, a very dark skin colour has prevailed in some regions with particularly intense UV stress, for example in Sudan where the dinka live. Mutations also occurred gradually, resulting in the skin becoming brighter. Because light-skinned people were unprotected before the sun, however, their probability of survival was low and with their premature death the gene variants (allele) responsible for bright skin disappeared from the gene pool. The first people who reached Europe about 45 000 years ago were also dark-skinned and they probably stayed for several thousand years. Unlike in Africa, a mutation that led to lighter skin was, however, not a survival disadvantage in Europe because UV radiation is less intense here. In Europe, clacids did not have to die prematurely and their alleles remained in the population. Why the bright blue phenotype has prevailed in Europe and parts of Asia, is not yet fully clarified. It is very likely that sexual selection was mainly responsible for it. Apparently, light-skinned people were perceived as particularly attractive, so they planted most successfully and gradually continued to increase their share in the population. The earlier hypothesis that the bright skin should have been a survival advantage because it should have been beneficial in the production of vitamin D (vitamin D is formed in the skin, but UV light is necessary), is probably not true or should not have been the main reason. Recent studies show that people successfully survived for many generations in Europe with dark skin color and that dark skins do not suffer more frequently from a vitamin D deficiency than bright skins.
Very interesting, thank you!
Since the first people (after the last state of knowledge I can remember) have evolved in East Africa, the first people should have seen the present indigenous people of East Africa relatively similar. How far the resemblance went depends significantly on what kind of person you put on your question about the “first people”. The earlier in development, the more dissimilar. But the first Homo Sapiens sapiens should have seen quite similar to today’s population.
However, the first today’s population of Africa does not determine the German population with white hair and blue eyes. These are attractors and not original homo sapiens 🙂
I should have added a “indigenous”; but I thought it was superfluous – especially since I made it up. A bit of cerebral malt can be assumed by the readers here…
Lightly brownish as the peoples in Near East today.
The races were only created by the sons of Noas or
women (1.Mose 10,1-32).
The light-redded to medium-brown dark-haired people of the Near East have nothing to report! They have always seen themselves as a somewhat better because they found the first high culture and writing, religion, science and mathematics in Mesopotamia and more importantly arable farming until they settled to Europe and North Africa and brought their scrap and racism together. Half of our so-called ancestors came from the Orient (Near East) and have mixed with the ancient inhabitants of Europe or indo-Germanized our language and culture and half of our comes from the Middle East! nix European
The first people, including the first Homo Sapiens Sapiens have lived in Africa
I think most like the Australians (Aboriginees)
so African? The ancestors were of this ancient African and destined no Australians
more than ape-like
So more Africans?
It’s not yours that you see monkeys like = Africans, right?!
You don’t understand my answer…
Why?
If you mean the first modern people of the species Homo sapiens, then more like Africans.
Yes Just Homo Sapiens we are humans and the others were displaced
The first people have probably lived in the current Africa, but there were no different people. By evolution, the different human races have developed
Breeds are no longer available. But these days we are all Homo Sapiens Sapiens and no Erectus, Neandertals who were genetically far from each other. We are too identical to make a subspecies from this, would be silly