Return robot vacuum cleaner?
Hello,
I bought a robot vacuum cleaner from Amazon a year ago for 300 euros.
I'm not satisfied with this. Because:
- Suction power too low
- Requires more attention than expected.
Amazon is often accommodating. Question: Should I try to return the vacuum cleaner within the warranty period? Reasons: Low suction power, bad software, etc.
What do you all mean?
No, you've had 30 days to test him like that, not until after a year.
Only if he's suddenly worse, make sure. What you want has nothing to do with warranty. If he's suddenly worse, or you're skinning it, that's checked by amazon, and if that's the same as was, you can say goodbye to amazon, for liars/deceivers don't want to have.
Amazon is quite cunning, but if it's been a year ago, it'll be more difficult.
But: questions don't cost anything. You can't get more than a no.
With a warranty period, however, this has not to be done. On the one hand, the thing isn't broken, on the other hand, you wouldn't get your money back, but it would run out for a repair.
I could say the suction force has dropped. That would be a lack
Did she leave or would it be an excuse? Here it is important to see how much the suction force has dropped. In the event of a slight loss, wear would rather be a deficiency in the event of a severe loss of suction force.
Even my expensive Dyson has lost minimal suction. That's normal.
But as I said, you don't get your money again, but you should send the device for repair.
Hello,
I would send an e-mail to the seller of the suction robot and also Amazon and request an exploration. This saves you unnecessary work.
Why not, save yourself money for something better
There is a statutory return period regardless of defects in Germany, if it doesn't fit you you can return it you need to pay any shipping costs, but that's actually not it works yes
With such a favorable purchase price of EUR 300, this should not be a defect, but a product property.
I read it, then he has to keep it
Well, if he bought the part a year ago, the deadline should have expired 😉