"There is no story without Harry" – subject?

What is the subject in this sentence and what question can I use to find out?

Asking "who or what?" doesn't make sense here.

LG Chris

(2 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
16 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
spanferkel14
1 year ago

The verb in the main sentence is determined by the subject (nominative). The subject usually stands directly before or directly after the verb.

So, who or what is there?

The

  • Noe History without Harry.
  • no beer in Hawaii.
  • Noen Wine more in the refrigerator.
  • Noen on the road. ES only You and Me and ouren Dackel Waldi.

P.S. The question is, of course, stupid. But it is only about finding the subject; and purely grammatically the question is correct.

spanferkel14
1 year ago
Reply to  ChristophG333

🌈🤗 But like.🌳

Kajjo
1 year ago

There’s no story without Harry.

The subject is “it”.

This is a special case for the fixed turn “there is”. Similar cases are, for example, “It’s difficult…” or “It hurts.”

Note that in many other sentences with “it” the function is different. This case must not be generalized here.

anjanni
1 year ago

It.

Reduce the sentence so far that you can even understand what (“is giving” is clearly the verb…)

“There is” – okay, you can say even if you would ask directly for the object (“what?”).

All other combinations with “giving” do not make any sense, do they?

(Clar: “Harry Gives” Sounds meaningful, but that’s another story…)

Pudelskern666
1 year ago

Asking “who or what?” doesn’t make sense.

Really?

WAS doesn’t exist without Harry? Answer: ES. This is representative of a subject.

https://www.deutschakademie.de/online-english/english/english/post-thema/pronomen-es-all-funktions

Variant 1 b (Stylistic “es” at the beginning of the sentence)

Tannibi
1 year ago
Reply to  Pudelskern666

WAS doesn’t exist without Harry? Answer: ES.

Right answer: a story.

Pudelskern666
1 year ago
Reply to  Tannibi

No. “No History” belongs together as a member and cannot be remodeled by the question so that it fits.

The question already involves such a transformation by the “not”.

Pudelskern666
1 year ago

My “in several ways wrong question” is just as “false” as yours, because it already contains the answer, which should not be. That’s exactly what I wanted to demonstrate.

Tannibi
1 year ago

I know. I only have yours in multiple respects
wrong question commented. In the context of this thread,
they are called “WHAT are there without Harry?” Right answer:
no story.

In any case, “no history” is a rechargeable object
and “It” is a (near) subject.

Wolkenschwarz
1 year ago

“Without whom is there no story?”

“Without the Harry”

Pudelskern666
1 year ago
Reply to  Wolkenschwarz

“Without whom is there no story?”

If so, “Without WEN”. And that’s the wrong question about the subject.

florestino
1 year ago
Reply to  Wolkenschwarz

Oh, my God, is that serious??? Then please don’t give any advice on grammar.

spanferkel14
1 year ago
Reply to  Wolkenschwarz

Are you kidding me?

verreisterNutzer
1 year ago
Reply to  Wolkenschwarz

Without whom is there no story? Without deN Harry. 😉

Renate2511
1 year ago

Hello, Chris.

Of course you don’t ask who or what?

It’s just in the battery: there’s no one or no story…

And you’re with the Harry. 😆

Just explained always goes.

Greetings, Renate.