Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
15 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
adianthum
3 months ago

It’s just a computer task, we used to get something like that in math.

Reading understanding + Maths = Solution

44, 5 g content, of which 16% low-fat cocoa powder and just half a gram of salt

Maize starch – cocoa powder – salt

Calculate percentage of individual components, search nutritional values of components in the network, calculate, complete!

Nelenai
3 months ago

Simply remove the calories of the ml indication of a 1.5% milk. Then you’d have to come to the conclusion. 148 x4 (since four portions) – calories of 500ml 1.5% milk;)

Nelenai
3 months ago
Reply to  Dackel123340

592 would be the powder + milk. According to the pack, you need 500ml milk. Look at the milk carton of a 1.5% milk, which it has in calories (which will indicate in 100ml). Thus, you take this number X5. Then you have the calories of milk. You remove this from the total calorie quantity of 592. Thus, the calorie content of the powder remains.

pony
3 months ago

No. that’s wrong.

you have to take off the sugar too.

mjutu
3 months ago

Since the photo is too small, a look at the associated website helps:

https://www.oetker.de/produkte/p/original-pudding-vanille-taste-3er

per 100g pack content 1490 kJ (351 kcal). The bag contains 44,5g, so:

1490 kJ * 44.5 / 100 = 664 kJ = 156 kcal

do you need the information for a scientific project? I hope it’s not about the pathological counting of calories because of an eating disorder.

[Request: The package contains only information on the prepared product, including milk and sugar. The link is more detailed.]

mjutu
3 months ago
Reply to  Dackel123340

Good. We are here also good question and there are many questions of people with magnificence who are in the spiral of horror. If that’s not the case with you, but you’re just curious, that’s good.

MAndersen
3 months ago

about 40 kcal…..without everything

https://www.wikifit.de/calorie table/backed goods/pudding powder vanilla

BerndBauer3
3 months ago
Reply to  MAndersen

That’s it. Can’t be right.

100g powder powder accordingly contains: 17g carbohydrates, 2.9g protein, 1.4g fat. And what are the remaining 88,7g?

MAndersen
3 months ago
Reply to  BerndBauer3

From chemistry, additives, because somehow the pudding has to be fixed. There are things in there, you’d never eat pudding again. But that’s the case with everyone…. everything is stretched, but we don’t realize. Chemistry is the magic word.

BerndBauer3
3 months ago

No, that’s not true. It must also be on the packaging, which is in it. The pudding is solid by strength. Strengths are carbohydrates, and have calories. That’s why it’s wrong that there’s only 40 Kcal in there.

I got a pack of pudding powder, chocolate, on Dr. Oetker. 44,5g in a bag. I just notice it’s exactly the same pudding powder as on the photo of the questioner. There is 83.9% corn starch in it, 16% low-fat cocoa powder, 0.1% salt, less than 0.1% vanillin. Otherwise there’s nothing in there.

On 100g are the 93g carbohydrates, not 17g. 2% fat. 3.2% protein. The 41.4g carbohydrates are calculated on the 44.5g package. 0.9g fat, 1.3g protein. That’s 185 kcal.

DERstobbel
3 months ago

You see that. PS: Your image is too small.