ByWalker52
Dear mathematicians,
I would like some feedback on this task, whether this would be a feasible approach or, if not, I would be very happy to receive a tip for one!
Thanks!
(2 votes)
Loading...Hi, why can you draw the lower triangle of the unit circle like this, instead of using the red line like I did?
Is a power a mathematical operation or rather a mathematical expression?
Berechnen Sie die folgenden Grenzen der (möglicherweise divergenten) Folgen I don't understand why the result is 3/320. Can someone explain this? Thanks!
The fraction for y is 1/alpha Can you transform the 2nd step into the 3rd step? In my opinion, the 2nd step is the end or you would at least have to divide what comes after the + by y in the 3rd step
What we're looking for is angle alpha. I've given you the two sides of the two legs.
I'm currently studying for a math test and I'm learning about equation methods. I understand it, but the problem is that I can't remember the steps very well.
Your proof is wrong.
You claim and use that kgV(a., b.) = a. ⋅ b. is. However, this does not apply in general, but only if a. and b. are part-nerd.
For example, on the one hand…
… and on the other hand…
kgV(4, 6) = 12 here not equal to 4 ⋅ 6 = 24.
===================
Here again about more formal with formula mode…
That the statement is true is obvious. Because a cannot have a greater divider than a and kgV(a, b) definitely has a as a divider.
But I don’t think the proof is formal enough. You do not prove that T(a*b) and T(a) have exactly T(a) as a cut.
Of which: The smallest common multiple is not equivalent to the multiplication of the numbers.
See, for example, 12 and 18, multiple is 36.