Price increase justified?
Today, PENNY announced that it is drastically increasing the prices of some items. For example, fruit yogurt was previously priced at €1.19, but is now priced at €1.56.
Mozzarella previously 89 cents, now 1.55 euros
Maaasdam cheese previously 2.49 euros, now 4.84 euros
Vienna sausages previously 3.10 euros, now 6.01 euros.
The reason given for this price increase is that it supports climate protection.
The cost of fertilizers is taken into account. The health of farmers must be supported because of pesticides, etc.
It is not yet known whether other discounters will follow suit.
But where will this lead if food prices skyrocket?
(2 votes)
Loading...
Wouldn’t be surprised now, moneymaking has become a trend.An action that doesn’t go at all.Encourage food?Everything has risen because of the energy Habeck and now again this is wrong.Penny should be avoided.
The action takes a week. You can go to net.
Each trader has the right to offer goods at the prices he considers appropriate. It doesn’t need more justification.
This is not for “the food prices”, but for a special action.
may sound evil now – but at least once we learn to appreciate food again – and I’m also talking about myself
I’m afraid I’m under a mistake. For the sausages it should be €6.01 instead of €3.10.
I also think too much food is destroyed. But I also think of those who can no longer afford such prices.
Read the other answers.
You just hear what you want. View notification until the end.
This is a kind of demonstration for a week. The higher revenues are also donated.
donated well but only customers take off very well.
You should first learn to read and understand then you would know the penny for a week requires the actual dietary costs to show what healthy food should be worth to us.
That’s not true at all. Jesus.
These are only nine products where, for example, only one week is shown, which would actually be the actual costs.
https://www.penny.de/actions/true costs
Always this pussy with everything. Stop lying!
There’s a lot of… But it’s been a problem for a long time: food must be cheap – how and where and at what price does not matter, otherwise the home cinema plant 7.1, the plasma television, the First Class 3 weeks of Maldives in summer and winter Thailand, is no longer enough a “standard” vehicle with min. 150 hp – there you are already in the lower social area… etc… It becomes interesting when comparing the spending on food, compared to the other spending, International… Gives a little insight into what importance we give to our diet – the Spotify-Abo has a higher priority, such as bread…
https://www.penny.de/actions/true costs
If you had the trouble to understand the background, that would have been something…
The difference is donated by the way! It is a one-week action!
And perhaps also to think about the “Geiz is horny” mentality.
But the latest smartphone, the holiday trip or the most beautiful flat screen TV are probably more important. And so here people jump in rows on this question that suggests what is not meant… shame!
Hopefully, this leads to the fact that you learn to appreciate food again, not as much meat and sausage, the quality rises and not so much lands in the garbage.
unharmed I find the especially older manner that has little money
One reason less to enter this i.d. very chaotic / with confusing product range
I’m trying yawflation (e.g. in case of a reduction in the content of the packaging and the “possible” simultaneous price increase) as far as I can handle it.
If we not only let ourselves be triggered by the rushing campaigns, we find that this is a 1-week demonstration of how high prices should actually be and the increased proportion does not come to the group but to the farmers, for example. But pussy is more fun, is simpler and you feel similar to the Barma-slapping: kick in and feel good, wasn’t it…?!
If that were coming to the peasant, that would make sense. But before the peasant profits, others have already looked down. The farmer is told what to pay is ready. If he delivers okay, if you don’t find another one to deliver.
A bundle of radishes for 49 cents. What do you think the peasant gets?
If the covenant cost 80 cents, the peasant would probably no longer be. In shopping there is the profit. This has always been the case and will always be the case.
Why are some of the foods of such poor quality? Manufacturers must try to produce as cheap as possible. There must be additives that are cheap.
Meat is thoroughly sprayed with water, which brings weight. You can see something left of a piece of meat when you cook it.
Such rakes that put up any institutes are for garbage.
Just like this ominous shopping cart where hardly any food is included for pricing. What does it use to consumers when an electric appliance was 30% cheaper, but the bread price increased by 20%? The bread price is not included in the shopping cart.
I’m sure I won’t let myself be triggered by any rushing campaigns. I have only seen disproportionate price increases in goods for months – especially in the basic food sector, which is guaranteed not to be explained by the war in Ukraine, wage increases and increase in energy/transport costs.
And Penny also has a “cheap” advertising campaign.
It is mainly because many consumers are not willing to pay for quality. You may remember that the Mars range disappeared from the supermarket shelves, for example, just recently, because the chains were not willing to pass the overprices of the manufacturer to the customers.
Moreover, prices have often been falling for a long time. And if something seems too expensive, I won’t buy it.
Only with this one-week action is to be taken attentively and with very, very few products, namely exactly 9 products that PENNY was looking for.
https://www.penny.de/actions/true costs
If you can open a barrel now, it means that you have not dealt with the action at all!
The food companies want to earn more money and increase prices more than they need.
blaze
again one who cannot read and think himself
That’s right.
Welcome to Bullerbü, your dream world…