Planespotting settings Lumix Gx-80?

Hey, feel free to write if you have good settings for planespotting with the Lumix gx80 and this lens:

Panasonic Lumix G Vario 45-200mm F/4.0-5.6 Aspherical Mega OlS

(2 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
IXXIac
2 months ago

Hello

1. At ISO 100, the GX80 sensor has 13 light values dynamics in RAW(RW2) and about ISO 6400 comes to the 8 bit JPEG limit. At ISO 800, you are still in the noise-free area for pressure and has 11 light values dynamic (HEIF). ISO 400 is signable with VN value below 1 as “noise-free” and on BT 709 TV monitors free of noise.

In principle, you can use the standard matrix/multi-field measurement and simply knip at ISO 400 and aperture 8 . This results in Central Europe in winter with daylight/light value 12 by 1/500tel closing time. With HTC Polfilter at 1/250tel. Airliners are predictable, mass-bearing motifs that you can easily take with you and get sharp even at 1/15 second with correct posture and exercise. If necessary, the ISO is turned high and sacrifices image quality but ISO 6400 is still good enough for full format newspaper printing, so “saleable”. About ISO 6400 you can still make pictures and then unravel in the post process. At ISO 6400 and 1/250 one has arrived at light value 8 that is about before the sun becomes orange.

2.) The GX80 has a turning wheel for shutter time and shutter, so you can work reasonably manuel. One uses the spot measurement/selective measurement on the lower area of the aircraft (shadow zone) as a professional and sees the histogram in the review or whether bright areas in the image are overdriven. If you need to work JPEG OoC/will then you need to accurately expose you have no error reserve as with RAW.

3. When you get down from the boring/documentary airline trickery (Callsigns) you will come to the limits of technology with the GX80 as a program automation system Knipser or you will have to “work”. Until then, you can learn to practice airliners.

4. One assembles a pole filter for planespoting and searches for an optimal position in which the filter works well, so the sky behind the aircraft becomes rich/dark. In addition, polfiters reduce the reflexes of metallic surfaces, which can be important/interesting in unpainted aircraft. In the case of painted airliners you can only see differences in the chassis, as forewings and as aircraft windows. Except there are rainwater pudders. Simply rotate the filter in series mode and then see which filter position yields. In order to see/fold the filter position in the motif, one can “stick” oneself (with fat) an index point on the filter glass. Then the windows are no longer reflected in what position to the sun stand. You can also see this in the viewfinder but there is a small difference between a searcher with HD resolution, a 4K softproof monitor and a DIN A3+ C print. As a photographer you have gallery printing as a target and not as 19″ FHD monitor or newspaper printing.

Uneternal
2 months ago

There is no painting for numbers in photographing because no one knows your light conditions and no one knows how fast the plane flies or whether it’s just standing around.

Work with the exposure triangle and you can give yourself the answer.

Linuxaffiner
2 months ago

The best way to test this with a variety of settings. I’d advise you on automatic shutters. Make the recordings with serial image function. Among the many recordings there is a successful picture.

LA