pissloch in unterbüchsen?

Hey Leut*innen und alle dazwischen,

ich hab mal ne Frage bezüglich den Unterhosen die man früher so getragen hat. Also man sieht es ja voll ift in Filmen und so, diese standardmäßigen weißen Slips bei männlich gelesenen Personen (z.B. Walter White würde mir da direkt in den Sinn kommen)! Und die sind irgendwie so konstruiert, dass da so ein kleiner Schlitz an der Seite eingenäht ist.

Ich als wissbegieriges Weibchen möchte nun natürlich gerne wissen, wofür das da ist? Meine Vermutung ist ja, dass man so easy einfach seinen Piepmatz hindurchstecken kann, was ja vor allem praktisch ist, wenn man mal schnell im Stehen irgendwo urinieren geht.??

Liebe Grüße

Eure Petri

(3 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
20 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mauli73
2 months ago

So I’m old enough to know that, as a child and adolescent, I’ve worn such things.

And yes, your guess is right. That’s exactly what the slot was there. One has raised the trouser scissors, pulled out the snail by the intervention (whether right or left is absolutely no matter, with right it was a little easier) and then urinated.

Klavininus
2 months ago

The slot, also called “engagement”, originally used to be easier to urinate while standing. Today, many hardly use it and prefer to pull down the underpants. I also had such underpants as a child – the intervention was standard at that time. 😊

Immohai5757
2 months ago

Then there would have to have been other pants depending on whether you were left-handed or right-handed ….

alpakka892
2 months ago
Reply to  Immohai5757

There are also bilateral interventions.

Immohai5757
2 months ago
Reply to  alpakka892

Sozusagen für Doppelpenis.

Mauli73
2 months ago
Reply to  Immohai5757

There weren’t so many left-handed. Most of them were wounded on the right.

DanielJames
2 months ago
Reply to  Immohai5757

In the 1960s and 1970s it was not as advanced. The children were better trained on the right hand when they were left-handed.

alpakka892
2 months ago

Your intension is right. Calls for intervention.

WwernerR363
2 months ago

That’s it!

inluvwime
2 months ago

No that would be unhygienic

Jonasboy100
2 months ago
Reply to  mikasetri

That’s exactly what happened. I’m sure there is still today.

More practical it is safe to open the (Jeans) pants

and pull the underpants at the front to urinate.

Mauli73
2 months ago
Reply to  inluvwime

What is unhygienic about it? You wash your hands (or not). But if women take that thing unwashed in the mouth of sex is hygienic?

MetallVirtuose
2 months ago

This is like a stretching joint so that the sex part does not have to adapt to the lower bush, but vice versa!

Jonasboy100
2 months ago
Reply to  mikasetri

No, that’s bullshit.

Mauli73
2 months ago
Reply to  MetallVirtuose

That’s nonsense.

Jonasboy100
2 months ago

I believe

MetallVirtuose
2 months ago

Everyone who tried it will say pulling down the bush is easier.