Physicist: Is that true?
The second one can't be right because they were electrically charged and I'm not sure about the last one.
(1 votes)
Loading...
(1 votes)Loading...
(1 votes)Loading...Similar Posts
Math problem Michaelis Menten constant?
The Michaelis-Menten equation describes the dependence of the rate of enzyme-catalyzed reactions on the substrate concentration. What is the rate (activity) of a reaction at a substrate concentration that is twice the KM value? Choose one answer: about 20% of the maximum speed about 50% of the maximum speed about 70% of the maximum speed…
Chemistry, can anyone help me?
Hypothesize whether cellobiose can be proven with Fehling's solution. Really don't know the answer…
Discussion question about lithium-ion batteries?
hey, I will soon be giving a talk about lithium-ion batteries in cell phones, how they work, their structure, and explaining the factors that contribute to a longer lifespan. Now, at the end, I have to start a discussion with the students, and for that, I need a question. But no matter how long I…
How big is the universe at least?
I have often read that the universe must be at least 250 times larger than the visible universe with its approximately 93 billion light-years diameter. But does that mean 250 times the diameter or 250 times the volume?
Magnetic force in the current-carrying conductor?
Does anyone understand this exercise? I don't even understand what the left-hand image is supposed to do. In the right-hand image, I've drawn the vectors of the magnetic force, which I (probably) know, using the three-finger rule.
Your answers are correct. The oil droplets are Electrically charged (can then of course not to be neutral) and become in electric field introduced (and not into a magnetic field).
He didn’t use a magnetic field.
And the second statement isn’t correct, is it?
No, they were loaded.