Physics (vertical throw)?
Could someone explain this to me, I'm stuck on the question.
Thank you very much 🙂
F 546: Sebastian stands on the winner's podium after winning a car race and removes the cork from a champagne bottle, which then shoots vertically upward at an initial speed of 8.50 m/s. The cork eventually lands on the ground in front of the podium, 2 m lower than where it started. Calculate without air resistance:
- How many meters does the cork rise?
- How long does it take to reach the highest point of its flight?
3 At what speed does he hit
when on the ground?
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading...
I would only expect 2) (t=v/g) then 1) (h=1⁄2gt2).
Then you just drop it 2 m deeper t=(2h/g)^1⁄2 and from time you get the speed (v=gt).
With the ‘passenger’ Formulas are also available directly to the results…
Hab at 1)3,68 m
2)866 ms = 0,866 s
3)
I can’t go on with the three.
Thank you, you helped me very much!
well, just drop out of 5,68 m…2 m deeper…
Got 1,076 s
1. After the energy conservation rate, he has the same speed as when he returns from above at each point as when he rises at this point. It therefore has v=8.50 m/s at the level of the firing. So we can re-form the question: from what height does it have to fall so that it has this speed?
Formula: v = √(2 g h). With v = 8.50 m/s. Dissolve after h!
Two. From the same considerations: formula: s = g/2 t2. With s = h from the previous task. Dissolve after t!
3. From height h, it just goes 2m further than h from 1st task. Formulas: v = √(2g (h+2)) and (h+2) = g/2 t2, dissolve after t!
small precision; what I said about speed, of course, only applies to their amount (don’t be Velocity). The speed is a vector!
General Tip: According to my experience, many such tasks (at least about the idea) can be solved with the help of the energy conservation set. We did not need it here as an explicit formula, but implicitly about a mental approach.
Thank you for the explanation 🙂
I don’t think it makes sense to write the solutions directly. The FS should do it yourself, GF is not a Mach-My homework platform!
If the results are soo wrong, I always think that is intentionM
All three results are completely wrong!
“Antwort of
2 minutes ago
How I know: professional experience”
All right, the criticism goes to the answer and not to your question. I think it’s good that you’re trying to do it yourself.
Hey! I didn’t write down the answers and I’m trying to make the job seriously, I wouldn’t be able to write it in the exam.
Physics is not my best subject, and unfortunately I don’t get so good in class. If I ask, I’m just asking for the explanations
Besides, I wrote DECLARES, not count it for me.
Of course, there are certain accounts on this platform that upload their entire homework and expect them to be processed for them. They deserved that.
I don’t think so. Your criticism is natl. legitimate…you can make it ‘better’ (like you), criticize (also like you), or you let it! That’s what Trolle!
I didn’t even look at the results to be honest. Of course it would be funny