Paypal account in the red?
Do I have to do something now or is it enough if I simply deposit money into my bank account?
Do I have to do something now or is it enough if I simply deposit money into my bank account?
Thanks everyone very much 🙂
Hello, I moved to a new city a year ago. I now live with my girlfriend. I quit my old job and looked for a job nearby. Now I have a new job that pays me back so I can pay off my debts, but I don't enjoy it at all. I haven't had it…
Does the website appeal to you Are there problems with withdrawing money – domestically and abroad pays you unpleasant fees how is stock trading
I received a job offer from Switzerland in the canton of Zurich. I currently earn €45,000 gross per year, including all benefits. The offer from Switzerland is in the same position, but with an annual salary of 79,000 francs as a base without any allowances. Since everything is much more expensive in Switzerland than in…
I stupidly used PayPal when I was under 18. I sold my old phone three days ago for €465. Now PayPal wants to investigate everything and has withheld my money. I also had €90 on it somewhere, which I can't use either. What should I do? You don't have to tell me that it was…
I'm currently testing strategies that involve trading currency pairs. I'm actually doing well at this point, but the spreads and fees are putting a damper on my plans, as they're higher than usual (I previously traded crypto on Bitget, with fees of around 0.06% per trade). My question is, is there a comparable exchange to…
That’s enough. But don’t get used to PayPal too much, as you’ll be locked up very soon:
PayPal is from 18without exception. You registered with an international bank with fake data. This is comparable to that you would open an account with a wrong ID with the Volksbank or Sparkasse. All this is illegal and criminal.
PayPal will soon ask you to add a credit card (which you will only receive from 18) or just indicate your ID for data matching and then it will notice that the date of birth is not true. Then you are a person locked to life. PayPal does not want users who have ever cheated PayPal.
Adding a credit card serves exclusively to ensure payment, not to prove the full year. PayPal also accepts debit and prepaid cards that are both issued to minors. Therefore also completely unsuitable as proof of age.
And the lifelong barrier is just a GF couple anyway. As soon as he is 18, he can create a new account from another mail address, upload an ID copy and account extract there, and ask via the hotline to remove and release the bank connection from the locked account.
In my knowledge, the PayPal does not simply accept when it requires a proper credit card. Cards with credit options are not accepted, especially for large-scale customers, such as the FS, where a debit has not worked out by bank entry.
However, this request is only a cunning on the part of PayPal and in no case does this request have to be met. PayPal can still refuse this and maintain the lock.
This is comparable to the fact that a shop owner can buy you back with you despite the house ban. You don’t have a claim because you still have a house ban.
A lifelong barrier as a person should ultimately also be difficult to protect data. The personal data cannot store PayPal forever without an active business relationship making it necessary. But it would be necessary to implement such a lock.
I didn’t deny it. However, depending on the interpretation of the terms and conditions, this remains a KANN, but you think it would be like that. And that against the PRAXIS, your assertion is not right now!
Again: PayPal itself publicly gives out the information about what full-year customers have to do that have been blocked due to minority. And the customer service also implements it.
Then how do you claim that the questioner is blocked at lifetime? Because of the theoretical possibility that PayPal practically does not use?
I deliberately wrote to have done OHNE damage. This also implies that parents do not deny their consent (substantial). If you look at the relevant questions of young people, parents usually know that PayPal is used. And I don’t think that it is possible to suppress that young people will have fewer inhibitions in the future. Most simply want to order online what, pay any services, games or anything else about it and have no alternative payment option. It is not possible to derive from this that they will sell goods by circumvention of the fees (which will also make more than enough adults). Not at all, if they were already locked as a teenager and had to operate with 18 effort to be able to use PayPal again. They then learned their lesson rather than risk a new barrier.
You should learn to read AGB correctly. Everyone Violation of points 1 to 8 is a prohibited activity within the meaning of point 9 and can lead to a barrier within the meaning of point 10. A violation of point 2.1 is a violation of against the terms of use and this is Bst. a. of point 9.1 that indicates that this is a prohibited activity within the meaning of this point, which can lead to the consequences of “speech” and “future use” .
It is quite clear that this leads to an account blocking and that future use of PayPal can also be prohibited. There is no limit to the next 5 years in the future, but in the future, without time limitation. The whole future is also meant in the future. Even a restriction of use of the next 1000 years of the future is possible for PayPal, which is no human being can survive.
However, because the legal business of the minor is only floatingly ineffective due to the lack of full viability and can therefore be revoked at any time – even after years – as long as the authorisation is not available, § 109 BGB. So it can be that after some time parents find the articles forbidden by parents and contest the purchase agreement.
What this represents for an effort when PayPal has to reimburse the money, but understandably can no longer move from the seller, since it has sold properly, you can surely imagine.
Anyone who has already violated the terms of use is predestined to do this again and then has fewer inhibitions of sales just as private to perform and PayPal to deposit the fees. The violation of the terms of use has worked once. Why not a second or third time?
Well, on the one hand, PayPal only reserves the right to prohibit future use. And this in case of violations of point 9.
But how to turn it and turn it: Nowhere is it that a registration as a minor leads to a permanent barrier. And practice now shows the opposite. So you shouldn’t be here as a fact and say to minors that they are locked for life.
Does it make little sense for PayPal to waive future revenues if the customer, though he was a teenager, did not do anything, but did not do any real damage.
But that’s exactly what you can do Terms of use read and accepted. At least this is confirmed when creating an account:
PayPal does not require proper credit cards, even with customers who already had repayments. This is also not necessary, since the amount is immediately requested and reserved for a PayPal payment with a deposited card. PayPal therefore also has the security to get the money for debit and prepaid cards (as opposed to direct debit).
No, I wouldn’t see it as a cunning. This is the official way to get a full-year account that is also communicated by PayPal itself. This procedure is also specified in the PayPal Forum for corresponding questions from PayPal itself. The only thing that remains permanently locked is the email address with which you have failed the guidelines.
In addition, PayPal does not communicate anywhere that an account creation of minors would lead to a lifelong barrier. This is only read regularly by some here on a good question without the assertion being demonstrated. Similarly as the half-truth is constantly spread, one would no longer have his credit.
Lt. Screenshot buch PP again.
It’s in it.
It’s enough if you deposit money on your bank account. Book this automatically in a few days from 🙂
Yes, fill in your bank account to show enough coverage.
Yeah.
Alex
Just deposit.
yes, that would be okay, then paypal can get the money