Hallo, in letzter Zeit habe ich nur Appetit auf Süßspeisen. Sachen wie Müsli, Nutellabrot, Mohnnudeln, Kaiser-/Grießschmarrn, Scheiterhaufen und so weiter stehen hauptsächlich auf meinem Speiseplan.
Ich esse aber zwischendurch nie was Süßes. Esse nur zwei bis dreimal am Tag.
Ist es in meinem Alter (19) normal?
Riskiere ich damit eine Erkrankung wie Diabetes?
(2 votes)
Loading...Mein Onkel war erst auf eine Kommunion , da gab es danach essen bis etwa 16 Uhr bei denen zu Hause und danach schon um 17 Uhr gab esnauf den 60sten Geburtstag seines Bruders ein 3 Gänge Menü mit Platten zum selber drauf tun. Das Essen ging über 2 Stunden immer nach und nach. Er…
Hallo, am donnerstag wurde bei mir eine sehr höchstwahrscheinliche Magenschleimhautentzündung entdeckt und seitdem ich die Magemschleimhaut entzündung habe ( schon paar monate ) kann ich seit samstag ca. nicht mehr normal essen mir wird beim essen total schlecht und esse noch total wenig sobald ich an essen denke wird mir schlecht. Jemand nh idee was…
Ich liebe so einfache Sachen wie Rührei, Spiegel-Ei oder Frühstücksei, aber werden dafür Küken geschredert oder vergast obwohl es Bio ist? Hab gehört das schredern generell nicht mehr erlaubt ist, aber dafür vergasen. Kann aber auch falsch liegen.
Hallo zusammen, ich bin schon etwas länger vegan und esse deshalb öfter Hülsenfrüchte. Davon bekommt man ja bekanntlicherweise schnell Blähungen und bei mir ist es nicht anders. Gibt es bestimmte Lebensmittel oder andere Wege, um weniger Blähungen davon zu bekommen? (Außer den regulären Tipps Wie abwaschen)
Also ich ernähre mich zwischen vegetarisch und vegan und ich mach das aus moralischen Gründen, wegen Klimawandel und natürlich weil es (scheinbar) unmoralisch ist andere Lebewesen für den Genuss auszubeuten. Vegetarisch ernähre ich mich deshalb manchmal, weil ich halt auch in dieser Gesellschaft leben und mir mal irgendwo ein Sandwich vielleicht kaufen muss und es…
As long as it’s not complete, it’s not a problem first. It is important that you cover your important vitamins and nutrients about the diet anyway.
You don’t risk diabetes when you’re just on sweetheart. However, your blood sugar quickly shoots up after eating such things and after a short time you have cravings to quench your appetite again and is more; at worst, you take it and risk diabetes with time. Does not only apply to sweets, also things like white bread, bright noodles etc. A vicious circle as he stands in the book.
A recommendation would be to prepare a lot of food yourself so that you can understand the use of your ingredients and possibly use sugar alternatives (such as xylit or erythrite, for example) that will satisfy your cravings on sweets, but less strongly or hardly affect your blood sugar, which does not cause the above-mentioned vicious circle. At the same time, you keep the taste and do not have this taste, as you otherwise have it from other sweeteners or Sugar alternatives know. Unfortunately, they are more expensive than sugar because the demand is lower, but my personal recommendation would be Xylit. Compared with sugar significantly more advantages.
Besides, it’s not just about diabetes, sugar causes much more problems than you actually think. I could list some, but then I’ll write here by tomorrow.
As I said, the amount and time makes the poison. If you don’t eat well, you don’t have anything to worry about.
In coffee and tea I always give candy so that I am not soo oversugart😂
As a non-diabetic you can even
do not oversugar ( Hyperglycemia
> 180-200 mg/dl, or 10-11.1 mmol/l).
It’s a good step. However, as it is typical sweeteners that do not meet the taste of sugar, I would rather use xylit. This simply tastes 1 to 1 as if you were using sugar, at least if your taste is important, but also has a few calories
“Diabetes” is just one Description for
12 different diabetes diseases,
and Diabetes types. The most common
are type 2 and type 1 diabetes.
♪
Through a lot of sugar, a bad diet, etc., you have no risk of having diabetes T1 at all.
Yeah, that’s all deeper, of course. But that’s not a science forum, and I’d rather like to explain to people how many things happen and how not. But of course, you can’t say that flat. Type 2 is possible, however, and most of them mean type 2 diabetes as a predominance.
Of course, I don’t want to tell you you’re annoyed. To your point “criticism” which I perceive as an attack: Here a certain recipient horizon intervenes; I’ll receive your signals and perceive them differently from you. You wrote the following:
I made this point. My intention was not to object to anything.
Here, however, a misunderstanding becomes clear: Of course “diabetes” itself is not a disease. I don’t want to say that, for God’s sake. I myself used the term “diabetes” as synonyms for type 2 diabetes. Of course, this is not concrete, but I do not see concretization as my task if I can provide the questioner with enough help with my answer. If I could help, I see my job as fulfilled.
I have even implicitly agreed to you in the commentary of origin, but unfortunately this has developed a rather unnecessary and, in my opinion, time-consuming discussion in which misunderstandings have arisen. Here again to your criticism or better your comment on my quote with the wording: “Then declare it right.”, which I perceived as very much better-visual and as if it questioned my answer.
That I was supposed to be annoyed,
or am… is a submission!
Aha… maybe this platform isn’t
the right one for 👉dich since you obviously
can’t handle some criticism…yes
interpreting this even as an attack!🤦🏻 ♀️
Nonsense…🤦🏻
No❗️
OMG…🤦🏻 ♀️… you have actually
still not understood…
… again:
“Diabetes” is not a disease
“Diabetes” is just oneDescriptionfor
👉12 different diabetes diseases,
and Diabetes types. The most common
are type 2 and type 1 diabetes.
What is inaccurate about my answer? I cannot guarantee 100% accuracy and precision on the millimeter if I Lavender to explain how the world works. If you’re so excited about any answers like mine, then it’s not the right platform for you, I’m sorry. I recommend forums dealing explicitly with such a subject.
The disease was already mentioned in the question and in my answer: Diabetes. Then I answered and said that the term “diabetes” usually includes type 2 diabetes – I make it simple and straightforward. But I can also understand in return if people like you react sensitively to it. This is not my intention to target something like that.
You take it very accurately and that makes the small but fine difference. There is nothing to push with “black Peter”.
What I mean would have been clear enough because, as I said, I am calling for simplicity. I also do not want to get out of my mistake with any means, as you may wrongly accept. I only like to know how you come to this thought; I’ve already formulated my position clearly enough and don’t spread half truths if you’ve noticed that.
Of course I think so.
No. It’s just different!
People like you who are about a certain
telling illness inaccurate and this
Disease not even name, care
for confusion and false information!
I have been doing this personally for 18 years
always firm and often become
nervt. Explanations and Corrections
of course, also hang on me… 🤦🏻 ♀️
By the way, you don’t have to think that I
do not notice that with all possible
means try you out of your mistake
to get out and to me the
black Peter wants to push for it!😹
Please note that many lay people are on the move and that an over-specialized answer ensures more questions and sometimes more confusion. For example, you have come too close to my original answer and, according to my feeling, you are making an excessively specific, unnecessary discussion in which you attack me with my way of explaining.
Each body is individual, which is actually the basic idea. And you say that there is no risk of diabetes type 1 due to too much sugar or poor diet, which is also right at first; Diabetes type 1 must also be clarified in the causes.
Now the big But: There is a risk for type 2 diabetes. But I also implicitly said that more belongs to this than just the diet. And “possibly” does not exclude that it is not possible. On the contrary, type 2 diabetes is very well possible or is better said to be “promoted” if you want to oscillate over accuracy.
As I said, there are many lay people on the way. Precise and good answers do not necessarily correlate with accuracy: So I perceive your comment and that the generality with the preamble of “diabetes” is about type 2 diabetes, my least problem will be that you like to be very comfortable echauffing. I am happy to address things and I believe that this does not make any more discrepancies in the contributions here.
Bullshit. To give correct and good answers, you don’t have to be a scientist!
Then explain it right.
No, not “in any case”, but possibly.
What most “my” is completely
irrelevant! Who is certain
Disorder simply a preamble
for several different diseases
use and make them together
into a pot, ensures
Confusion and misinformation!
Thanks, live in Austria
Depends on where you live. You can often find Xylit under the name “Birkenzucker” at dm or Lidl or else keep online. If you buy xylit in the supermarket, cost 500 grams approx. 3 to 4 €. Online is often different with prices.
hahaha was not so meant:)
All right, I don’t count calories. Thanks for the tip.
Kandisin, 100 pcs so costs 1€.
Do you know how much xylite costs?
Hello ifragmal172, 👋
healthy is of course not….
Especially if you are overweight
and you are chronically too little.
If you are normal weight and you are much
so these carbohydrates all move
burning/consuming, it is not so tragic,
tend to feed many sweets.
Well, what’s “normal”… maybe you have
a growth trend and
need a lot of fast energy at the moment.
Or you eat too few foods as
vegetables, fruit, legumes, salad, fish,
Full grain products, dairy products, nuts, etc….?
“Diabetes” is not just one disease,
but only one Description for
12 different diabetes,
and Diabetes types. The most common
are type 2 and type 1 diabetes.
♪
Type 2 diabetes (overweight diabetes)
mainly arises:
DURCHstrong overweight/obesity
ANDyears of unhealthy,
carbohydrate – & fat – rich Nutrition
ANDchronic lack of movement.
MEISTis also a genetic
MRP present.
👉Alline of lots of sugar, or candy
you do not suffer from type 2 diabetes.
♪
💉💉💉Type 1 diabetes💉💉💉💉 you risk
not at all, because this diabetes disease
has diet, body weight
and to do nothing at all.
💉Typ1- Diabetes💉 is (in contrast to
Type 2 diabetes) an autoimmune disease
and there can be any person
at any age.
♪
LG 🙋🏻
This is absolutely unhealthy!
This is extremely unhealthy, and you lack important nutrients!
Diabetes is not caused by sugar, but only by fat. I had written a detailed explanation of how diabetes arises in detail.
Nutella, pastries, cakes, candy, sweets make fat and cause diabetes because they contain a lot of fat. Not for sugar.
Yes, it can promote long-term diabetes, but if you remove the fat from the ingredients of such sweets (oil, margarine, butter, etc), then it will not cause diabetes, no matter how much you eat.
No, Diabetes T1 is not caused by fat❗️
Your explanations about diabetes
Disorders are wrong and disgusting!
No❗️
Fat caused in sweets
no diabetes T1❗️
No, it can also be with the years
do not promote diabetes T1❗️
Also nonsense
It’s obviously about type 2 diabetes, why do you always force the subject to type 1?
That my speeches and linked studies should be wrong you need to justify and proveOtherwise, your criticism is worthless.
It is and remains as I have explained. This confirms the entire science.
This is and remains wrong, no matter how often you repeat it!
It is and remains as I have explained.
So please call the reasons and evidence for your rejection and linked studies.
Sorry, there was a typing error.
It must be correct that your remarks are unfounded!
Self-conversations don’t help!
Deime’s opinion is wrong!
FALSCH!
They’re all up to you.
It is your problem if you refuse to read them or do not understand them.
There are no substantive arguments from you.
Please mention the reasons that provide evidence for rejection and linked studies and explain how the mechanisms should be instead.
Right!
But don’t have to, because arguments you don’t get new every hour!
Simply start reading the serious studies and contributions instead of sticking to nonsense!
“No” is not an argument. It’s the way I explained.
Ask for the reasons and evidence for rejection and linked studies and how the mechanisms should be instead.
No…no…no…no…no…all wrong…!
Too bad you are
I didn’t understand anything!
Your explanations are incompetent and
wrong and proved you didn’t!
Fat increases blood sugar levels by causing insulin resistance and promoting glucose production in the liver, causing sugar to accumulate in the blood and thus to increase. I had already explained and proved that a short-term insulin resistance was created by fat.
Ask for the reasons and evidence for rejection and linked studies and how the mechanisms should be instead.
.
Your record has…🥱🥱😴💤💤
Ask for the reasons and evidence for rejection and linked studies and how the mechanisms should be instead.
Where are such incompetent
Wrong statements❓
Stories from the Paulanergarten
What kind of table??
In 18 years I’ve never had such a thing
SALE table seen!!️
Where is such a bullshit told that
Type1er to iwele tables!?️
It will be according to individual FAKTORS
injection moulded or embossed
No, type 1s do not squirt all after
ominous table!!️🤣🤣🤣💦
No!!️❗️❗️❗️
That’s exactly what’s super❗️🥳👍👍👍
At the same time, these fats enter the cells, trigger insulin resistance,
❗️
The beta cells of type 1 diabetics are broken anyway❗️😹
Complete nonsense❗️🤦🏻
The insulin level can be
do not rise at all… 😹😅🤣💦
BZ does not increase fat
If one eats fat, the
BZ slower and therefore not so high…
and this is VERY GOOD!!More IE must
are therefore NOT SPRITZEN
You don’t even know what a
eigtl. Insulin resistance is! It arises
not in a few hours, but in
👉multiple JAHREN❗️And type1er
have no insulin resistance!!️
Bullshit
It’s TALK!!
The result of sugar with fat
👉also NO insulin resistance❗️
FALSCH, because TRANSPORT!!
GENAU DAS make type 1 Duabetiker
sometimes so that the BZ is not so fast &
rises!!️This allows you to
avoid harmful hyperglycemia❗️🥳
No, she’s not❗️
But, of course, it makes sense
Wrong!!️
The aim of each type 1
diabetics is, as far as possible
always the right/fitting
quantity of insulin to spray,
to hyperglycemia
and hypoglycemias
to avoid!!!!!
No❗️Total bullshit!!️
Also completely incompetent nonsense!!!️❗️!
What kind of German is that?
All real experts agree and criticize you.
Ask for the reasons and evidence for rejection and linked studies and how the mechanisms should be instead.
would agree.
All real experts in the field would laugh and criticize you.
Ask for the reasons and evidence for rejection and linked studies and how the mechanisms should be instead.
All the experts in this area would laugh at you. That’s right. They’d laugh at you…
All the experts in this area would laugh at you.
Ask for the reasons and evidence for rejection and linked studies and how the mechanisms should be instead.
That’s still wrong!
…will confirm all my statements!
My statements are still correct.
Your lack of understanding does not change the truth.
So again:
Let me mention and present the reasons and evidence for rejecting my speeches and linked studies, and how the mechanisms are instead.
Anyone who has more knowledge of science to diabetes would shake the head with your statements.
No matter how often you do it again, your assertion is demonstrably wrong!
There have never been any arguments from you. The statement is absolutely correct. But you have such a limited understanding of the subject that you do not notice.
This is known to be F A L S C H!
There have never been any substantive arguments that could refute my remarks and linked studies. Never.
This is only true to you. I have presented a large number of reasons and evidence. You are the ones who can’t justify and prove anything.
This is only true to you. I have presented a large number of reasons and evidence. You are the ones who can’t justify and prove anything.
Some users have already tried to clarify these persistent claims. If scientific facts are ignored, twisted or simply not understood, then one can only point out at some point when false claims are set up again.
If you are using a dozen different accounts, you cannot expect to receive all the evidence for the Xth time. It doesn’t use anything if someone doesn’t want to know the truth.
So again to keep the red thread and publicly clarify who is telling nonsense and who is not.
Please Reasons and Evidence to show why my speeches and linked studies should be wrong, and how the mechanisms are instead.
You say sugar is the problem, not the fat. Please present the reasons and evidence for this statement.
Anyone who argues argumentatively and intellectually at such a low level, and still has such a great deal, is pressed by me like a parrot again and again to the burden of proof. And then we’ll see who’s not serious.
I’m just argumenting purely objectively and objectively. For this, you always have to say the same things, only right if small salmon numbers constantly delete my comments and you have to reinstate the comment.
In such unripe sentences, I only see incompetence and several logic errors. You can see amateurs from real professionals in an area.
You’re smart enough to understand the meaning of “not serious.” The parrot clown number is not provocative, but boring.
And now the justification and evidence for this statement. The whole clowns with low knowledge level do not believe me, but all with a higher epistemic level like e.g. researchers would agree. Lastly, a research group was invited by researchers who are researching glatzen and insulin resistance. It was funny.
Permanent repetitions reinforce the impression that your contributions are not to be taken seriously.
(2/2) Since my statements are well-founded and have been documented with a lot of sources, it is not enough to simply reject them (Hitchens’ Razor to apply to me). You have to be able to justify and prove his statements, otherwise they are worthless. If we cannot, it will be in a debate as intellectually insane denotes.
Appeal to Incredulity Fallacy
Information is rejected from a limited, incomplete or incorrect understanding. “I can’t imagine that X should be true, so X must be wrong.”
Appeal to Stone Fallacy
Person A (ich) claims X. Person B rejects the claim X. Person A asks the rejection. Person B does not give reasons or evidence.
It is obvious who has better arguments and deeper understanding.Topic finished.
(1/2) It is not possible to respond to the request to justify and demonstrate the rejection of my comments. Then I close the subject and leave the comments on the opposite side as a bad example.
Hitchens’ Razoris a philosophical principle that says:
Hitchens’ Razor is a useful tool in discussions and arguments tounfounded claimsto question critically.
Also presentfalse evidencecan be likeNon-existence of evidenceto be treated. Thus Hitchens’ Razor allows to discard all the statements made byfalse premisesorMistakesto be justified.
Hitchens’ Razor is an epic and argumentation theory.In an argument, therefore, there is the burden of proof of an allegation with the party to the dispute which raises the claim.If this claim cannot be justified, the counterparty may, in accordance with Hitchens’ Razor, reject the claim without further grounds.