Mustang V6 vs EcoBoost?

Moin zusammen,

ich stehe grad vor dem Kauf eines neuen Mustangs. Jedoch weiß ich nicht ob ich den V6 oder den EcoBoost kaufen soll da ich unterschiedliche Sachen im Netz gelesen habe. Der Wagen wird als alltagswagen genutzt und zwecks der Arbeit 400km die Woche gefahren. Daher bietet sich kein V8 vom Verbrauch her. Ich würde gerne mal eure Empfehlungen und Erfahrungen hören.

Vielen Dank

(1 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
14 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gehilfling
4 years ago

Definitely the Ecoboost.

Advantages:

  • European vehicle
  • V6 is speed limit due to cardan shaft and engine cooling
  • Performant and splashy motor
  • Customer service possible
  • Savings
  • Tax savings
  • Sound at both. However, the Ecoboost has invested a little more

I don’t think of a reason that speaks for the V6. By the way, you can also drive the V8 relatively economical (at about 8.5l / 100 km above sea level). But with the Ecoboost you are also well advised.

But please, no US imports. Unfortunately, you are often disappointed with the vehicle history! (Recognisable among others on smaller side mirrors, other GT logo rear, as well as red rather than white backlights)

In the Mustang community, the “V8” is still the place-branch, but also the Ecoboost drivers are well received and it is and remains a great car – even if not a V8 drubbert.

Gehilfling
4 years ago
Reply to  MotoGuy1

I’d rather invest a little behind in the exhaust (if you don’t get it) than go around with an imported V6 that’s locked at 200 km/h.

Fetischfeind
4 years ago

I don’t know the cars, but if you talk to colleagues, you can say that you drive a v6 and another time you have to say you drive an ecoboost^

Fetischfeind
4 years ago
Reply to  MotoGuy1

v4, no four-cylinder?

How is the performance?

and what are you talking about?

the will need less and give less

Fetischfeind
4 years ago

then listen to help

and take the ecoboost^

my vater swears on cylinders, I don’t know, so important I don’t find it, I also find ballers more important than running culture

I drove a v12, yes, but soooo horn it wasn’t

except that I could troll my chef because he had only one v8

it was divine, at the Christmas celebration, I was interning

he tells a business partner about his MB sl v8

I say

“yes, it’s a very nice wash, but of course it’s just a v8, whereas I’m driving a v12”

my god, that was one of the horniest things I could ever say

I had a 12 year old bmw 750i

his car was worth 10 times as much, but it had disturbed him

he said then

“Yes, I hope that I will be practical again sometime so I can drive a v12”

but it was still ultra

Gehilfling
4 years ago

The Ecoboost is a normal 2.3l series four-cylinder. Performance both have relatively identical (317 hp Ecoboost vs 304 hp V6), where the V6 should go significantly worse according to experience reports. The Ecoboost I’m a test driver myself, it’s really good.

LetzterRitter
4 years ago

Consumption will certainly only be good on paper.

Turbo’s running, turbo-acids.

zocker0796
4 years ago

I would see such a car as hobbie and the 100th euro a month more for Sprit for a V8 like to pay. A 4 cylinder motor in such a traditional sports car. I don’t know.

Gehilfling
4 years ago
Reply to  zocker0796

The V8 can also be driven in a semi-saving manner. With my current winter tires you get to good 8-8.5l.

But what is the bigger crunch point at the V8 is the taxes of over 500€ per year. They are of course lower at the Ecoboost.

But everyone has to make the decision. At my approx. I don’t care about 5000 km/year.

ZuumZuum
4 years ago

A real mustang has 8 pots. All the others are only blenders.

Gehilfling
4 years ago
Reply to  ZuumZuum

Were the Mustangs of the 3rd generation with 2.3l four-cylinders already Blender? You can overlook the fact that the 4 cylinder in the current Ecoboost is nothing new in the Mustang.