ByNurDichA
Let's say you smoked 1-2 joints and then 2 weeks later during a general traffic check it was discovered that you still had the cannabis breakdown product in your body.
Can I then fight against it based on the lower value, or won't even the best lawyer help?
Fine is secondary, important would be driving license and mpu
(1 votes)
Loading...Guten morgen liebe Leute Mein kollege und ich haben vor ein paar Stunden einen kack Autounfall gebaut…. Den hätte man einfach verhindern können… Naja egal was passiert ist, ist eben passiert 😅 Wir sind super mega schnell bergab gefahren und er konnte nicht früh genug mehr bremsen ,zumindest war er zu spät Sind in einer…
Hello, Maybe a stupid question, but why don't car manufacturers install two oil pumps? If one oil pump fails (which often fails early on), it doesn't immediately result in engine failure, but rather the second oil pump is used as an emergency solution to prevent engine damage. The oil warning light doesn't necessarily prevent engine…
My driver's license was revoked because I was caught driving under the influence. I applied for a driver's license, completed the application, and submitted it to my local council. The application also included a checkbox indicating that a certificate of good conduct should be included. This was also done at the council, and I've already…
Wie hoch ist eure Suchtanfälligkeit? (Allgemein)
Forget the answers you have received so far, because they are all wrong:/
If you are only stopped with low degradation values, idR does not happen at all (because the values are so high that regular consumption can be closed), because then you have shown severity.
Otherwise, the following applies: active Value, this shall not exceed 1 ng/ml.
However, if you were to regain control (and active THC) you could not rely on one-time consumption, it would mean that the driving licence would then be withdrawn directly. A new division could then take place only after a positive MPU.
The judge decides that. Due to the coming “legalization” one eye can be pressed when the value is very low.
In the same way, it may be the case if the reform comes into force.
In the worst case, it may be that an MPU is still prescribed.
I personally think it would be worthwhile if you depend on your driving license (to get to work, university, school etc).
Greetings,
Marcel
A judge doesn’t get to see the whole thing and he doesn’t decide about a MPU. :/ The OWI is a matter of fines, MPU regulations fall into the area of FEB. And the planned legalization has nothing to do with the limit in road traffic at the moment, because it is questionable whether it is raised at all…
Well, thanks for the clarification.
Always depends on the individual case. However, in drug use, the tendency is more likely to allow you to enter the MPU
…but not if these are only low degradation values.
That is why I wrote an individual case decision
Is very different depending on which specialist and individual case you had. There are cases where it doesn’t matter, there are other cases immediately withdrawal.
What surprises me more: Why is a blood collection or hair sample made in a normal traffic control? In the urine, after 2 weeks, one sees nix more and without reason there is no blood collection. That is, you have either been very noticeable or extremely stupid.
I didn’t do anything, just wanted to start from the worst scenario
This is a scenario with many ifs and buts.
Sorry, but there are very clear guidelines to which the FEB has to adhere, because not every SB can decide “after pleasure and mood”…
Legislation specifies that in the case of active values from 1 ng/ml, the consequences of driving licences must be reckoned with; in the case of low degradation values, the necessary separation capacity was proved.
Jupp, however, is one of the requirements that a blood test may be arranged only in the event of an accident. Let alone that, without susceptibility, intensive control is only allowed very limited.
Thus, the scenario is already very far from reality in the first sentence or actually impossible. If it would happen, every lawyer would have easy play.