Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Comp4ny
10 months ago

Is that enough or can they still demand the collection fees?

If possible, the HF should always be paid to the contracting party and also VERMERKEN (!) as the payment should be used.

If the claim is justified, collection fees must be paid if they are entitled to the amount. Whether they are depends on what you’re asking and you’d have to break down in detail.

Regularly inadmissible, however, various other items from a collection ABER are already charges such as “mason fees” due to the amount.

A dunning fee can only be charged if the actual costs have also been incurred. Here is the creditor / debt collection in the order to prove this.

No debt collection fees at Groupinkasso!

At present, there is a large pattern-fixing action against EOS Inkasso.
EOS Dekasso is a subsidiary of the OTTO Group, among them also include shops such as Bonprix or myToys.

Collection fees are not deductible and are net profits for the parent company, so they must not be estimated. Consolidated collections see this differently, but legally inadmissible.

Or another example:

  • DELTA Inkasso GmbH
  • PAIJ Service GmbH
  • NM law firm

Are also a group.
Here the DELTA collects for the PAIJ service, you don’t pay, comes the NM law firm.

The problem is, if you look at the writing more closely, it is explicitly mentioned that you are driving on behalf of the PAIJ Service, but with which you usually have no contract, you would not have reacted to writing the PAIJ, etc., which is not possible, because the PAIJ does not send any letters.

Therefore always: AUGEN ON ! and exact testing & informing

JollySwgm
10 months ago

If the collection fees were right, you’ll have to pay them.