Should one expect the dividend to be cut if a company's share price falls by 45%?
(1 votes)
Loading...
(1 votes)Loading...
(1 votes)Loading...Similar Posts
Is the cost-average effect with a savings plan really useful?
My bank advisor has been recommending a savings plan for a sustainable fund for some time. She argues with the "cost averaging effect," which means that you should benefit from price fluctuations if you invest automatically every month. But wouldn't it make much more sense to decide each month how much you want to invest,…
Income under 18?
Hi, I'm currently 16 and still in school. I'd like to start earning some money, but I don't have much time for a part-time or mini-job. Do you have any tips?
Official share price vs. broker spread prices (short & buy)?
For example, on Google you can find the current share prices for every share on the planet. But which course is that actually? Because when I look at the respective share price at a broker, there are always two price indications a) short price i.e. the selling price at the respective broker b) Buy price…
Save or spend?
Should you spend your money lavishly, following the motto "You only live once," or should you save it? What are your thoughts on this?
What kind of money do you trade with?
I'm a little confused right now. When day trading, do you trade with your own money, or do you automatically borrow it?
How much tax on stocks?
There's capital gains tax, solidarity surcharge, and church tax. (There's also a small tax allowance.) Is there any way to avoid or reduce these taxes?
In most cases, such a fall in price means that the overall market has just become more difficult or that the company is currently facing special challenges it has to face. It is then obvious that a dividend is smaller or even completely deleted.
If the company continues to do good business regardless of price turbulence, there is no reason to shorten the dividend.
Yes 45% is already very handy. It can happen that the dividend is shortened. It also depends on whether it was very high before or still low. For example, Apple could probably drop 50% without having to shorten the dividend because it is very low with 0.5%. If she were 50% traps, she would be at 1% that would still be no problem.
Yes, of course. If the current price reflects a dividend over 7%, then of course it is much too high and becomes at least. 5% cut. It’s so common.
Bayer has paid a similar dividend as the price at 132€ as at 40€…
She’ll be shortened. I don’t expect anything else. At least 5% are still interesting!
No, the dividend is independent of the share price.