MPU statute of limitations despite application for reissue?
If you have had your driving licence for 18 years and have taken two MPUs in vain in the first two years… but then applied for a reinstatement a few years ago and withdrew it after the MPU order, why does the maximum 15 years start again from the beginning…
Isn't it illegal to order an MPU for an offense more than 15 years later, regardless of whether the driver has since informed himself or applied for a reinstatement? Is this contestable since the offense occurred more than 15 years ago?
In the meantime, there were no traffic offenses.
I ask for sound knowledge.
Thank you very much
(1 votes)
Loading...
You write, you made two MPUs in vain. If a failure of the driving licence has been made, it is also entered in the driving register (FAER), and the 15 years begin from the outset.
If you’re not right, you’d have to try to have a suspected illegality in the action.
Yes, that was already in the first two years.. after that followed 16 years..
In these 16 years, however, I have submitted a request for redistribution 2x and withdrawn after the still demanded a mpu.
I am wondering if this is counterfeitable that the 10 or even 15 years may only begin again for application and withdrawal.
Since the Delikt and also the Mpus that have not been released are more than 15 years behind, the knowledge about it must justify an MPU?
It ultimately depends on whether there is an entry in Flensburg. He doesn’t necessarily stick to rigid deadlines, but after over 15 years, he would have to be out. So if something is still noted, then due to further entries, or there is an error, which is extremely rare, but can occur.
Maybe a lawyer should look into your file.
According to §29 para. 7 StVG, after erasure from the FAER, the act may no longer be used against you, except there is another final decision that is related to it, for example the failure after a negative MPU.
In order to avoid the latter, the request is withdrawn instead of waiting for failure, as the applicant does not have a legal administrative act of the Authority. The eradication cannot be influenced by an application alone.
What legal basis did the Authority specify in its letter?
The reason for the recurrence is:
“a few years ago submitted an application for redistribution, and After MPU order has withdrawn again”.
You should’ve got a file first.
The application has allowed the whole to start after the MPU has been demanded,
there was no return.
What would the legal basis for such a procedure be?