Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
38 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
wickedsick05
2 years ago

Plants

For by consumption, the following are substantiated:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZXGHspYW9E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt9AOCCX1KY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9IA02SQcgU

Plant protection products are among the most intensively tested chemicals. Before a remedy comes to the market, it is usually tested for 10 years and the results are thoroughly examined by independent state bodies around the world.

https://www.tierversuche.bayer.de/de/tierversuche-fuer- Pflanzenschutzmittel.aspx

Animal experiments – we do this to them

https://ethikguide.org/infothek/tierversuche-das-tun-wir-ihnen-an/

The dog is considered the ideal test animal to test pesticides. The classic test dog is the beagle, as he is good-natured, small and handy. Golden Retriever and other breeds are also used.

http://www.aerztefuertierschutz.ch/index.html?id=40

Pesticides: slimming death in the lake

http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/natur/landwirtschaft-pestizide-verringenern-artendiversity-in-gewaessern-a-906263.html

For the cultivation of oil palms, the rainforest is massively cleared – at the expense of climate, biodiversity and indigenous population.

http://www.sueddeutsche.de/wissen/palmoel-regenwald-sparen-fuer-den-supermarkt-1.1457107

The globalisation of the markets allows us to purchase fruit and vegetables all year round. The import of food produced on the southern hemisphere of the earth makes us forget the knowledge “what grows when”. There are strawberries for Christmas, asparagus in March and grapes to Pentecost.

http://www.dlr.rlp.de/Internet/global/themes.nsf/0/D58A32E6A3826437C1257727004728C8?OpenDocument

For 1 kg of vegetables from overseas, 11 kg could be transported within Germany, compared to transport by plane, it is almost 90 kg.

https://www.ugb.de/forschungsstudies/hohe-environment-environment-environment transports/

The enjoyment of plants thus brings the painful poisoning and fragmentation of billions of animals, predatory farming, extermination of whole species by monocultures, the destruction of food, the waste of water by low-nutrients plants, fine dust by mass import/export, greenhouse gases that worsen climate change, rainforest destruction due to southern fruits and palm oil, soy oil, water poisoning due to massive pesticide use and art th…

EinAlexander
2 years ago

want to ask what the most morally dismissable eating is what you get in the city.

Almond milk.

The only thing that speaks for the use of almond milk is the lower production of greenhouse gases cf. the production of 1 liter of cow’s milk.

Otherwise, the cultivation of almonds causes more damage and suffering in the animal world than the production of cow’s milk on a demeter farm:

Most almonds come from huge monocultures, which cause great damage to flora and fauna. Almond trees require very, very much water (the production of 1 liter of almond milk requires 17 times more water than the production 1 liter of cow’s milk).

In order to pollinate the almond trees, billions of bees are distributed every year on the plantations. They are exposed to constant transportation, stress, high occupation densities and a monotonous, pesticide-stressed environment. This industrial beekeeping is considered to be a co-polluter for bee mortality as it weakens the immune system of the animals and makes them more susceptible to viruses and parasites.

Alex

Coliibri
2 years ago
Reply to  EinAlexander

Good to know. For years, use almond milk and never questioned what I’m sorry about. Thank you for having described this in detail. I will not buy almond milk in the future.

Blindi56
2 years ago
Reply to  EinAlexander

The same applies to any monoculture and also our agricultural system: bees in the fields find nothing more and starve. The only thing that blossoms is the invasive Jakobskreuzkraut, which is also valid for bees….

EinAlexander
2 years ago
Reply to  Blindi56

Similar applies to any monoculture

Right.

and also our agricultural system

Correct. The more we turn into arable land, the more biodiversity is lost and the more animals must die.

Torontonian
2 years ago

Almond (…all), Avocado, Mango

Waste of water Flight, Processing. In almond milk, for example, the almond content is additionally zoomed. Rice is also already marginal, bananas also

Hipp 🙂 Climate positive does not exist, neutral is co-financed only with “free shopping” such as environmental projects (as throw paper into the ozone hole)

All Green Ultrawash products with such labels

(If you want to annoy them (*g*), they should understand that)

kiniro
2 years ago

Animal food and berries from regions whose groundwater level is very low.

Coliibri
2 years ago

Hummer, because the preparation of lobsters is painful and disgusting. They are cooked until they are miserable.

In addition, I find the speciality in Japan of the living squid as discardable.

Goldstueck811
2 years ago
Reply to  Coliibri

You can also warn at every corner, :))

Coliibri
2 years ago
Reply to  Goldstueck811

What does that have to do with it? Even if there were only one restaurant, that would be dismissable.

ChristianLE
2 years ago
Reply to  Coliibri

The problem is less killing through boiling water (this takes only a few seconds), but the time from catching to the restaurant (dark, tight costs and combined scissors).

Goldstueck811
2 years ago

Maybe for you.

Coliibri
2 years ago

You can also warn at every corner, :))

Doesn’t sound very friendly, rather provocative, so my answer.

Goldstueck811
2 years ago

? I just copied it!

Coliibri
2 years ago

I only read “in the city”, so read the other one. Was of course my fault. But honestly find it very bad that you couldn’t point me out normally.

Goldstueck811
2 years ago

The question was:

…would ask what is the most morally discarded eating what you do in the city

Honeysuckle18
2 years ago

Meat of animals that were either “coherent” or “halal” weakened !

Even the – gladly taken – almond milk does not get…

DeernVomDienst
2 years ago

Frog legs

verreisterNutzer
2 years ago

Klauen the food and eat it yourself

Matermace
2 years ago

It’s a bucket of KFC.

Buhlii23
2 years ago

Human flesh

slonn
2 years ago

Human flesh.

avocadorable666
2 years ago

Any animal products

Iohanes
2 years ago

Bullshit!

Do not understand ecology?

A proper ecosystem only works with plants and animals, fungi and bacteria.

Environmentally sensible agriculture is a circular economy! This ensures the greatest possible biodiversity in nature!

Get off the high horse and work with ecosystems.

avocadorable666
2 years ago
Reply to  Iohanes

Even if we were to farm ecologically meaningfully, the question of morality remains

Blindi56
2 years ago

That’s not true….

EinAlexander
2 years ago

In addition, it is unrealistic

It’s not. Doesn’t matter, nor does it change anything that it is morally discourageable to drive with the combine harvester over a field of oats and kills hundreds of animals at the oats harvest so that we can consume the sweetener “leaves’ milk” as to milk a cow that weeps her life on a meadow so that we can drink cow’s milk or eat the eggs of chickens on her farm.

avocadorable666
2 years ago

Even then, the probability is high that she gets extra food. In addition, it is unrealistic

EinAlexander
2 years ago

For the fodder of the cow, hundreds of animals are also killed

No, not if the cow – as I wrote – turns her life on a meadow.

avocadorable666
2 years ago

You didn’t understand my argument. For the fodder of the cow, hundreds of animals are also killed + the male calves and finally the cow itself.

EinAlexander
2 years ago

However, feed, i.e. plants, is also required for animals in the food industry

If someone with the combine harvester drives over a field of oats and kills hundreds of animals at the oat harvest, so that we can consume the sweetener “seed milk”, this is morally fine.

But if someone melts a cow that weaves her life on a meadow so that we can drink cow’s milk, that is morally no longer okay.

That’s funny.

avocadorable666
2 years ago

That’s a good point. However, feed, i.e. plants, is also required for animals in the food industry. If you live vegan, you “overspring” the suffering of the animals in the (for example) meat industry. Utilitaristically, therefore, still the more sensible variant.

Iohanes
2 years ago

You’re too pimped!

I also advise each of the meats to be involved in a slaughter. So that the respect for the creature remains. The animal must also be kept art-friendly and, of course, be slaughtered as stress-free as possible.

The farm animals live only because man uses them for his purposes.

This respectfully handled is completely okay.

EinAlexander
2 years ago

Even if we were to farm ecologically meaningfully, the question of morality remains

Well, then let’s ask, why is it morally miserable to kill animals to win animal food, but morally all right to kill animals to win herbal food?

Iohanes
2 years ago

Above all, I know I’m not pimpeded and the world isn’t pink!

If you look like Demeter’s people do, let the esoteric mischief go away, you see how it works!

avocadorable666
2 years ago

Exactly. You are a person with a consciousness, you can decide what you want to eat.

Iohanes
2 years ago

Yes, tell your cat and the dear wolf!

Man is neither lion nor beef

Augustiner68
2 years ago

Mc Donalds Fraß