Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
8 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Photon123
2 years ago

300mm, even at APS-C is just so little that you can save this immediately to make a detailed recording. Where moon photos belong to the most banal motifs ever. Makes sense to build something into a beautiful landscape and you should use tripod. Since the moon is also smaller in the picture, it is also possible to illuminate longer because it simply moves “slower” by its small size than if you had the format-filling.

Uneternal
2 years ago

Alternatively: Nikkor 18-105mm

That’s not enough for moon shots.

Today’s cameras have the advantage that you can immediately see the photo and not wait for a week for the photo development. So where is the problem, you can try it yourself in just a few minutes?

I just give you the tip, as the moon moves slightly, you should not choose too long exposure time to 300mm, otherwise it blurs easily. At least 1-2 seconds.

A good starting point for settings is 1/100 f/8 and then see how high you have to/can with the ISO without the moon being overexposed.

Zalla55
2 years ago

Maybe it helps you realize that the sun is full on the exposed part of the moon.

noname68
2 years ago

You just have to try it. also the sickle-shaped moon can be photographed with quite short exposure times, and at the best a whole series.

but isn’t it too late? at 3% this is only possible shortly after sunset, at least in Central Europe

camera actually doesn’t care, this with 135 mm f5.6 and 5 sec at ISO 800

Pialesb29
2 years ago

Moon Photographing is so easy that even I can

Manual mode:

Exposure time: 1/100

Iso: 100

Blend 10

Lazarius
2 years ago

Look here, please.

I took the exif data on you.

a nice evening and LG Lazarius,

Pudelskern666
2 years ago

very:

ghost40
2 years ago
Reply to  Pudelskern666

Very nice;-)