Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
16 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bronzezeitler
11 months ago

A very clear N E I N.

Stamping price coins is a mass production, it’s mass, not class. It is simply not possible to see the millions of a coin, all to 100% equal. That’s not possible. Therefore, certain tolerance values are calculated. Only when these tolerance values are clearly exceeded, only then could one possibly speak of a misprint.

No one buys such 08/15 coins.

ichbims5678
11 months ago

Each of them is worth exactly 2€.

LottoOtto99
11 months ago

As always with the “Fehlprägungs” questions here:
It’s not a misprint, the coin’s just in the ass.

Value is on: 2 Euros.

guterfrager5
11 months ago
Reply to  LottoOtto99

I would even exchange the ones at the bottom because I still have ned the ones in my collection … but only for 2€ 😂

Biertrinker90
11 months ago

Looks like committee

edgar1279
11 months ago

They’re all not misprints.

Sososos1278
11 months ago
Reply to  edgar1279

The last

verreisterNutzer
11 months ago
Reply to  Sososos1278

No. This is completely normal and is called “acceptable tolerance values” with millions of coined circulation coins. Who thinks this is a misprint, has absolutely no idea in the field of “numismatics”!

Sososos1278
11 months ago

worth 6€.

ant8eart
11 months ago
Reply to  Sososos1278

where is the difference?

comment image

verreisterNutzer
11 months ago
Reply to  ant8eart

None. And on the picture, by the way, there is also no misprint. 🙊

verreisterNutzer
11 months ago

Well, these prices are all pure fantasies to get any ignorant money out of your pocket.

I’ve been really thinking about offering normal 2€ coins over eBay at extremely high prices. Maybe there are some people who jump on it!? 🤷🏻

ant8eart
11 months ago

The whole thing does not make any sense, however, since the answer has been cancelled. There were four-digit prices.

verreisterNutzer
11 months ago

Oh, okay.

ant8eart
11 months ago

by the way, no imprint

that is why I ask, was meant to be rhetorical.