Michelson-Morely experiment?
In the experiment it was assumed that the light parallel to the direction of motion of the Earth needs tp= 2DC/C 2 -v 2 seconds, normal to the direction of motion only tn = 2D/√C²-v² seconds.
a. Explain how these values were arrived at and how this difference in running time should have been recognized in the experiment.
b. A point on the Earth’s surface is already moving at
high speed. At the same time, the Earth orbits the Sun and the entire solar system orbits the center of the Milky Way.
The sum of the various velocity components of our solar system, derived from measurements, is about 370 kilometers per second.
How large would the time difference have to be if the mirrors A and B were at a distance from the
middle S of one meter if we assume this speed for the Earth?
Note: Convert the unrounded result to nanoseconds to see the difference!
Can someone please solve the examples?
How do you calculate the runtime difference? Is it the same as I calculated it? Can you please answer?
Hello Hala1666,
the MICHELSON MORLEY experiment (MMX) should demonstrate the movement of the Earth relative to a hypothetical, omnipresent supersubstance called ether with an interferometer. The rays migrate the armhin and back and overlap what gives stripes.
According to MAXWELL’s ideas, the light always spreads with c relative to the ether.
The idea is that the light relative to the interferometer in movement direction with c − v =: c(1 − β) and against in this direction with c(1+β) and therefore overall
(1.1) tp = d/c(1 − β) + d/c(1 + β)
need. In order to add, we must extend the first summand with 1+β and the second with 1−β; with the third. Binomic formula
(1.2) tp = 2d/c(1 − β2).
When the light signal is moved transversely to the direction of movement, it must be clear that the light signal relative to the hypothetical ether is oblique and its speed in the direction of movement has a component of the size cβ. c√{1 −β2} remains for the component transverse to the direction of movement, so that the signal back and forth
(2) tn = 2d/c√{1 − β2}
needs a little less time (the denominator is a little bigger, there is always something smaller than 1.
The difference is
(3.1) tp − tn = 2d⁄c(1−β2) − 1⁄√{1−β2}),
where we need to expand with √{1 − β2}:
(3.2) tp − tn = 2d(1 − √{1−β2}) /c(1−β2)
Actually, this can no longer be simplified. For β < 1, however, only β2 < < < < 1, and so we can approximate
(N1) √{1 − β2} ≅ 1 −1⁄2β2
and the approximation
(N2) 1⁄(1 − β2)≅1 + β2
apply and receive to (3.2)
(3.3) tp − tn ≅d(β2 + β4)⁄c ≅dβ2⁄c.
When turning the interferometer, his arms change the rollers: The previously longer runtime becomes shorter, the shorter longer. As a result, the interference strips should move.
You set the numbers in (3.3). Very coarsely calculated β is somewhat less than 5⁄4∙10-3, i.e. β2 ≅25⁄16∙10-6 and d/c is somewhat more than 10⁄3∙10-9 s, so that in this case
(4.1) tp − tn ≅ 250⁄48∙10–15 s;
so a little more than 5×10-15 s comes out.
Apparently, it’s pretty close.
By the way, the difference in gear of light waves is surprisingly large, namely
(4.2)
clearly above the wavelength of visible light, which lies at as much as 3.9×10-7m to 7.8×10-7m.
But where does the beta come from and how do you calculate it?
Simple β=v/c
Thank you for the star!
v = k * c = 1,233… *10^(-3)
D = 1 m;
tp = 2*D /c * [ 1 root(1-k^2) ] / (1-k^2)
tp – tn = 2,5 *10 (-15) sek = 2,5 10^(-6) nano sek
No warranty for typing errors.
But tp= 2DC/C^2-v^2
is v= 370km/s =370000m/s; or
Consider that for β < < < 1 the approximation
√{1 − β2} ≅ 1 − 1⁄2β2
Article 2
Okay, maybe I forgot the factor two when calculating. I’m not thinking about it again.
I have also used for D=1 but in the formula 2D is therefore and is the transit time difference tp-tn or is it calculated differently?
The indication was not clear what D is exactly. I used for D = 1m. The solution in the picture is twice as large as my solution. This would result for D=2 m.
Time difference is tp-tn or what is different and this solution agrees the one in the picture .Thanks in advance
Yeah.