Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
36 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Drevin
1 year ago

Then your girlfriend is superficial, because for your body you can nix that is now the genetics that prescribes how long a foretaste of the penis is. You can only change them by surgery. This, however, is your free choice and not your girlfriend’s decision. Genital mutilation is, by the way, not circumcision and therefore this term of mutilation is also inappropriate. If you want to keep your foreskin, tell your girlfriend. If she doesn’t accept this, she’ll separate you. Men must not suggest to their girlfriend that they should increase their breasts or other examples.

Drevin
1 year ago
Reply to  Noahqwe

This is actually dangerous to call a circumcision on man/boys as mutilation. A (genital) mutilation is only in women and not in men, because the life and experience of sexuality through this intervention is usually extremely limited and not only in exceptional cases. However, despite circumcision, men can continue to experience good sex and sexuality in general – women do not. A circumcision with the man as mutilation is more likely to be the risk of rushing and exclusion, just like anti-Semitism, racism, bullying and the like. However, it is clear that circumcision changes the penis and that this can be perceived individually both positively and negatively. This does not justify the definition of mutilation (see above). Think about it. And no, I didn’t say you were to be circumcised to emphasize this again for security reasons. And yes, to cut children without their consent, can be seen critically.

dave0069
1 year ago

I have to speak again. Very relevant, since a general comparison is also quite appropriate. Of course divided into individual degrees of severity. The foreskin is of course a single, independent part of the body.

Drevin
1 year ago

Read my answer again. The relationship you have mentioned is irrelevant because it applies to the general comparison. Your definition point is not true, as the foreskin does not count as a single body part, but the body part is the penis and it is not removed.

dave0069
1 year ago

that is so in fact not correct. In addition, by definition, everyone is considered to be mutilated, who feels like this through a physical violence done to him. Whether girl or boy. Moreover, most forms of female genital mutilation are much smaller than male circumcision. on three circumcised girls come 13 circumcised boys worldwide (in proportion) from the circumcised girls are “only” 17% affected by the invasive and truly limiting so-called pharaonic circumcision. Everything else is a nicvt unambiguously definable issue of execution, or the abilities of the executive cutter. Search the male circumcision can have serious consequences

Gentlef
1 year ago

I’m a gay man standing quite neutral. Optically it is often not very appealing, but during sex everything works.

KathKath98
1 year ago

It’s just optical. A normal length would be visually more appealing but would not disturb me a long foreskin.

Jost79
1 year ago
Reply to  KathKath98

Just as a supplementary input: A long foreskin is also one of the normal lengths. There is no standard but diversity.

Max15236
1 year ago

Personally, it would bother me. Until a couple of months ago, I had another foretaste. My friend wanted a circumcision from me and I let it go. Find it now honestly beautiful and better.

Katharinaa2000
1 year ago

ICh find cuts beautiful

ewigsuzu
1 year ago

You have to pull them down while you’re having sex, and it’s not a big pleasure.

ewigsuzu
1 year ago
Reply to  Noahqwe

Well then there can’t be anything against, except a friend who keeps this for himself, even with women ned sees everything pretty out of it but it doesn’t have to be greedy for children therefore…

transatlantik93
1 year ago
Reply to  Noahqwe

Then that’s her problem. Not yours.

dave0069
1 year ago

then she’s not worth yours. If she really loved you, she wouldn’t care what exactly your penis looks like. Does this or that wrinkle interfere with her vagina? Are you even thinking that she should be able to cope with your wishes? You really want to be with such a girl? You’re in a very difficult situation if you really love her. You could look for the conversation with her about how you’re hurt by this demand. Maybe she’ll laugh, maybe she’ll find you immature, but all of this would only show how small she’s compared to you! If she doesn’t show any change in conversation, you should drop her. To lose you for the rest of your life good 2/3 of your penis sensitivity, for a girl who judges you pure according to externalities. That doesn’t sound good. Write if you have asked and don’t let yourself confuse 🙂

ewigsuzu
1 year ago

change the girlfriend, sex is ned everything but already important…

Thor87
1 year ago

Hit her to enlarge her breasts. Or to tighten her Po or something else. Maybe she can see how hurting her statement is. These are natural things you cannot change. And whoever is not willing to look beyond such things is not a good partner in a relationship in my eyes.

ewigsuzu
1 year ago

that is also stupid, that certainly didn’t have to do

BeYouHP7
1 year ago

I don’t care.

grisu2101
1 year ago

What’s the problem with your girlfriend?
She’s really acting like a hammer.

The preskin belongs to the man, like the labia to the woman!
Or do you think the female sex organs are more beautiful?

Don’t let yourself be cut for such a crap! I can only warn against it.

Drevin
1 year ago
Reply to  grisu2101

circumcision is not bad in itself, but for this reason, because the girlfriend wants it, not a good idea. Only if the boy/man wants this himself.

grisu2101
1 year ago
Reply to  Drevin

circumcision without medical reason is bad and brings only disadvantages!

grisu2101
1 year ago

I think the one who doesn’t read here is you.
Just stop interpreting things.

Drevin
1 year ago

Wow, you either didn’t read my answer or didn’t understand it. Read my answer again and correct your own contradiction.

grisu2101
1 year ago

Yes. The foreskin has its meaning!!

circumcision without a medical reason should be prohibited.

Drevin
1 year ago

Also no, because in addition to medical reasons there are still other reasons, such as your own desire for whatever reason. In order to follow your answer, a medical circumcision would be good without the affected man/boy wanting to do so. That’s total bullshit, as you hope to see yourself. It is not to underestimate your own desire, with or without medical reasons or reasons.

Curasanus
1 year ago

Without foreskin, girls/women would get rare underlying cancer.

Drevin
1 year ago
Reply to  Curasanus

Irrelevant contribution.

dave0069
1 year ago
Reply to  Curasanus

is so wrong. This refers purely to men with existing phimosis or lack of genital hygiene. Tudem, on the other hand, has a very common vaccination available for every available 🤦 ♂️

grisu2101
1 year ago
Reply to  Curasanus

That’s wrong. Smegma can be washed away. Who doesn’t do this is a piglet.

Curasanus
1 year ago
Reply to  grisu2101

There are still billions of viruses and bacteria left. For cleanliness, “man” should wash the penis with warm soap water every 20 minutes. I don’t know anyone who does that.

grisu2101
1 year ago

That’s nonsense. Also the cut snare is not germ-free!