ByNext1Up
Lohnt es sich noch einen Verbrenner zu kaufen bzw. auf einen zu sparen oder sollte man lieber auf ein E-Auto sparen? Was sagt die Zukunft?
(1 votes)
Loading...Hallo, ich würde gerne wissen ob ich noch 2022 eine mt 07 mit Euro 4 zulassen kann (würde gerne auch noch mit dem Motorrad in der Stadt rumfahren) in Stuttgart.
Hi Leute, ich wollte mal fragen welcher BMW als Erstwagen gut geeignet ist. Ich bin 18 Jahre und habe ca. 5000€ Budget und verdiene 450€ bei meinem Nebenjob. Das Auto würde ich über meinen Stiefvater versichern. Welcher BMW wäre gut als Erstwagen? Einige Beispiele von Autos die mir gefallen: e36, e39, e46.
Ich wollte einfach nur wissen welches Auto ihr schöner findet und was der Grund dafür ist und welches Auto kann man sich eher leisten. MG B GT: AH 3000:
Habe mir ein Auto angeschaut wo in der Anzeige stand scheckheftgepflegt mit ein Jahr TÜV . Nun habe ich Probegefahren und es besichtigt , ein Vertrag unterschrieben und eine Anzahlung gemacht . Den Wagen und Scheckheft sowie Schlüssel durfte ich nicht mitnehmen den Rest würde ich bei Abholung bekommen . Nun stellte sich raus der…
hallo ich habe bei thomann vorbei geschaut und wollte fragen ob es dort sicher ist zu kaufen
Hi, bin 16 Jahre alt und 1,70m Groß. zur Frage: kann ich mit dieser Körpergröße Enduro fahren? Da man ja über Stock und Stein fahren muss etc. und man oft auf den Boden kommt. Ich hätte Bick auf ne Ktm exc ich fange zwar nicht jetzt an aber denke schon an die Zukunft so mit…
I don’t think the Trent will stop for the e-car. They are not environmentally friendly in the production of batteries, nor in the production of raw materials for batteries. Even the disposal of the batteries has not been resolved in any way. Sure, there is the argument that the batteries hold for 30 years, but that’s what they say about nuclear energy. The fact is, we leave our children again our garbage, just like our predecessors.
That’s exactly what I think, so I’m worried about right now. Thoughts about buying a used car, whether it makes sense. Unfortunately, Germany is making many mistakes in this respect. Just like with the wind turbines and the solar power generation.
I need my car for the long distance, I don’t have time until my car is loaded in Cologne and I can continue to Hamburg. Everyone has to decide how to use his mobile base. I’ll drive my car further until someone can make me a reasonable hydrogen offer. The subsidy of alternative energies to stop or to lose was indeed a big mistake.
From overshooting current peaks, which hitherto have to be disposed of or regulated in a cost-intensive manner. See link above.
But where are you?
No, we will need methanization in the long term for the storage of renewable electricity, as it makes not only economic sense to use it for cars.
Z.b. https://www.eskp.de/Energiewende-umwelt/die-hoffungsstraeger-hydrogen and-methane-935978/
The production of methanol is, unfortunately, too expensive, in Brazil they drive with a bio-mixture E50, only here the same motors are supposed to already fail with E10. The methanol is produced in biogas plants, which means that instead of food, rape is cultivated for the plants. At the E10 Boom we have already experienced how potatoes, bread, vegetables became more expensive, because it was too little cultivated, to gunns of rapes.
After electro now and hydrogen thereafter, methane(ol) will end.
Let’s see what’s coming to us in the future.
Not only the fact that e-cars are subsidised (i.e. purchasing premium).
They are the future for climate neutrality and I would not buy burners anymore.
This is not true with climate neutrality as long as production and power generation is not climate-neutral.
I am aware of this, but a combustion engine is once again a multiple of the emissions of non-sustainable power generation.
At present, 5-6 years old currents with partly below 50,000km of running power are already scraped again, because their real-world distance is down to below 50km and the battery exchange would cost over 20,000€.
Buying such a vehicle makes no sense, whether we calculate the cost-effectiveness or the load.
I understand what you want out. I wouldn’t call it a lot. Petrol engines emit 44% more than electric cars per km, according to the following BMU investigation. https://www.bmu.de/fileadmin/Data_BMU/Pools/Broschueren/elektroautos_bf.pdf Page 7.
What about battery production and disposal?
Yes, definitely. Until the e-car policy passes, it takes 20 years. This question is at the earliest in 20 years
Really “reward” is a new purchase only for the producer and the dealer.
New purchase is not in my intention, only needed. I’m sorry I was wrong about my question.
A used car makes economic but also ecologically much more sense! Let’s talk about it: if you earn your daily bread with the card, then you pay.
Either way, it gets more expensive.
As long as no one forbids me, I’ll go on with gasoline.
If it’s a used person, why not?
The question that I ask is whether it is worth spending 20,000 for a used one.
Well, it is clear in the course every year.
The question is, how do you use the car? How many kilometers a day, a year? For 20,000 eurons, there are also new cars, what a used one is going on?
For 20 K + 6 or 10 K premium you will get an acceptable e-car.
Yeah, that’s the one who falls, that’s why I wouldn’t worry, I’m aware. However, the question for me is whether it is worth spending 20,000, as e-mobility progresses and it would be worth waiting and investing there.
I will buy a burnt
I find horny, brumm, brumm
with 850 ps, which consumes 30l to 100km
I don’t go much anyway and I’ll let myself go
Then don’t ask yourself the question that it would be fatal if you now spend 70,000 for a new car, for example, and then it is said that the government no longer wants to allow burners. Wouldn’t it be thrown away?
therefore I will not buy a new car for 70k
The 850 HP Brumm Brummi would have you liked to have
no, not really
autos are money destroyers, I actually prefer to buy the money
but 250ps or so I get myself next
Let’s see how the whole thing develops. Thank you for your detailed contribution.
Right:)
Production is meant in the subject of ‘forbiding burners’. Then it will take about 20 more years to slowly disappear on the streets. Some producers (e.g. Toyota, Kia) have already announced that the production of Otto engines will be stopped in the foreseeable future. Large workshops are already equipped for the maintenance of e-mobiles. No one has the intention of completely prohibiting burners on the highways.
I don’t think, especially after my knowledge, the Germans want to remain true to the burners. As I said, worry is always there.
before 2030 they will not forbid this
though., when annalena gets there, everything is possible
It was just an example with the 70k.
Yeah, well, all of a sudden, the e-car still humps out of the egg.
The future belongs to the e-cars.
If you can start driving and you should burn a used one
How much € would it be worth it, what would your opinion be?