Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
8 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Beatzmaster
3 years ago

The mouse is too slow, too distracted and too dizzy. The technique in the Leopard 2 is paired with the force of its arming of the mouse overlaying lengths – even if the two would meet in the open field, the Leo would be superior by its weapons stabilization, speed and maneuverability of the mouse.

The Leopard 2A7+ has a power of up to 810mm armored steel on 2000m against which the mouse could effectively counter a 243mm thick bow armoring (200mm with 65° inclination). Even the tower visor has only 220mm at the front. The mouse wouldn’t last long.

ichmagmemes
3 years ago

quite clear, however, the mouse would have a chance to make the leopard 2 from the side or at the heck completely incapable of fighting.

also “lighter” panzer like the panther with its 75mm cannon would have sufficient firepower

PappelPappe
3 years ago
Reply to  ichmagmemes

The crew could also consider good strategies, and so the Leo 2 just shredded!

EinfachReden01
3 years ago

Mouse, is slow, no electronics, low armoring compared.

The crew of the leopard clears the mouse over several kilometers (but it depends on the terrain on it) ne KE ammunition with a 750mm penetration to 2km and destroys the mouse.

IchBinNormal750
3 years ago

Is like cat – mouse game, the cat always wins! So in this case the Leo 2!

Marvinkow
3 years ago

Obviously…

PappelPappe
3 years ago

The mouse is strong enough. If the crew were to think about good strategies, she could crush Leo 2!

Jens0048
2 years ago
Reply to  PappelPappe

Nope!