Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
11 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DodgeRT
1 year ago

I grew up on the land, then pulled into the city – would not have to go back to the land.

DodgeRT
1 year ago
Reply to  natixat

always depends.

at the land is quieter and more relaxed. you are easier to get in touch with people and actually always have jmd that can help you iwo if you need jmd.

in the city have more opportunities to go on, meet almost always new people because they are much more than at the village and you don’t have to drive min car.

always depends on what age you are and what you like to do. if you are not a disco-man, but rather on fire-resistance-proof. then it is better to land. If you like to go shopping or don’t like to do with people, the city is more anonymous.

AlexausBue
1 year ago

Land.

I live and enjoy the tranquility, the low costs, the people, the empty streets and supermarkets and the available parking spaces.

In the (great)town it would be too loud, hectic and too expensive to me, the people are distant and only busy with themselves and the streets and parking are full.

I don’t know an advantage to live in a city.

AlexausBue
1 year ago
Reply to  natixat

No, it’s never everything close. Something’s gone. Even the social environment (Friends, Family) does not exist, so you have to drive to another place all the time.

In addition: in the city are the goals not nearbyThe nearby are. I can call you here 5 things that are not close to any big city.

I’m dependent on the car anyway, so it doesn’t matter whether 3 or 5 out of 100 destinations I’m starting a month are nearby.

AlexausBue
1 year ago

buzzing

Right. That’s why I don’t live in a loud city, but in the country.

jochenprivat
1 year ago

I just want to go straight to the country. I/we live now on the outskirts of a beautiful small town. It’s coming over a lot.

edgar1279
1 year ago

No, we live on the outskirts of a small town and that fits perfectly.