Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
20 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TheDutchOven
1 year ago

The question is too general. It just depends on the talent. Singing lessons can promote talent but not replace.

What is a good album? And what’s a bad album?

An album is simply a collection of pieces of music.

In today’s time, with a reasonable microphone for €50,- to €100 on a reasonable audio interface for €100,- to €200,- can start quite nice recordings. The software, which not only takes up microphones but with which you can also record or create complete pieces of music, is a so-called DAW (Digital Audio Workstation), such as Cubase Elements, Cubase Artist or Cubase Pro. Also Cakewalk for Bandlab is a professional and very extensive DAW, which is even available free of charge on the internet.

With talent and technical skill you can produce your own album.

UnterhaltungNRW
1 year ago

That’s what’s going on today. There is no need for talent or teaching. Otherwise, whether it’s to be marketed?

TheDutchOven
1 year ago

Of course, that’s an attitude. You can be quietly talent-free and the studio will do it. True art thus does not arise, at most Top 40 crap with a felt half-life of 5 minutes.

But, of course, you can also produce your own music at home with a DAW and see how far you have it technically and musically or just as a hobby.

UnterhaltungNRW
1 year ago
Reply to  TheDutchOven

Unfortunately, it is done. That’s why it all sounds the same today. The “soul” is missing

I have only the ambition to entertain people. So cover. partly a little in my own way.

A nice hobby to get your head free after work. I’ll take my shots myself. I want people to know what’s going on live. It doesn’t help to show any great studio productions and there’s only hot air at the show.

electrician
1 year ago

You can always publish an album, which goes on your own. Just wonder if you will be successful.

xxXScarfaceXxx
1 year ago

This comes only to the basic talent, because some people can train for years and become only better, but not really good.Without real talent, the most intense training does not bring the desired success, see Menderes von DSDS, who has been making music for decades, sounds much better than his first recording, but he still sings badly.

Desparativum
1 year ago

Since there is no need for a specific talent nowadays, this should not be a problem.

minimax11
1 year ago

You can publish everything. If someone else wants to hear it, it’s on another sheet.

minimax11
1 year ago
Reply to  Coco1303

If you can sing well before, maybe. What’s good?

Many former amateurs without training are excellent musicians. But they did it with passion.

Because after half a year singing lessons is almost like no teaching… It’s the first time you start.

Good luck to you!

Jack98765
1 year ago

The technology is the same. You can also publish an album without a vocalist.

Foxi42
1 year ago

Well, you can publish an album even after the first hour of singing whether it is now the cup hit is ne andete ask

Foxi42
1 year ago
Reply to  Coco1303

This is far too individual to be able to answer this is what you were for me music direction as well as you were at the beginning of the lesson if you were still playing an instrument and so many versed other things carry yet once again to your family odwr friends what before and ask them what to think about whether they have any suggestions to improve

selbrgschraubt
1 year ago

It’s nice to find time to answer while you’re working on your first novel.

SarahSchweiz
1 year ago

You can do it without lessons. You then call the plate stylish: “My cat has pain”

Grobbeldopp
1 year ago

You can always publish an album if you want.

ronnyarmin
1 year ago

You can do that even without singing.

mausigertyp
1 year ago

clear if everything else is regulated and you are good enough