Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stefan997
2 years ago

Both stood in the room once. Today we know, “From Africa”. At least 95%.

The homo sapiens has developed in Africa. Other descendants of the homo erectus in other parts of the earth. In Europe this was the Neanderthal. Its territory ranged to the Levante (now Israel) and at the first large emigration wave it came to mixing (fertile descendants) of both species. Therefore, the type term (exclusive homo sapiens / homo neandertalensis) is actually outdated, but is still used.

All Europeans and Asians have emerged from this mixed population. Thus, not only the Europeans, but also the Asians have a few percent of Neanderthal genes.

Another mixing is that of the denisovaman into this already existing mixing pupulation man. The Tibetans, some older people in Southeast Asia and the Polynesians developed.

Darwinist
2 years ago
Reply to  Knochenjimmy

Not applicable Speciesbut if, then Species. However, the status of different types is controversial, depending on the type concept and the warehouse of taxonomy (Splitter vs. Lumper) they are underlying.

Lumper distinguish only three species of the genus homosexual: homo habilis, Homo erectus and Homo sapiensThe Homo erectus “archaic” Homo sapiens) and then produced several lines (subspecies). Accordingly, the Neanderthals and Denisovans are to be classified as subspecies, which is also the anatomically modern person (Homo sapiens sapiens) belongs.

The Splitting Taxonomy is more closely oriented towards the phylogenetic concept and admits to the Neanderthaler the status of its own type, Homo neanderthalensis and differentiates further species, e.g. H. rudolfensis, H. heidelbergensis, H floresiensis uvm., which are then also called “chronospecies”. The Splitting Taxonomy in the trend, I personally tend to Lumping Taxonomy.

But it doesn’t matter which of the two schools one belongs to whether the different line of origin is now referred to as subspecies or as species, there have been several mixing events. The roots of all lines lie in Africa.

The history is so simple:

  • from H. erectus the archaic H. sapiens : This resulted in several lines, one of which emigrated to Eurasia, at least two remained in Africa. The Neanderthals and the Denisovans finally emerged from the emigrated population. The population remaining in Africa developed into anatomically modern people, who are already very likely in Africa with the third line of archaic Homo sapiens hybridized but fossil unknown.
  • The ancestors of the Neanderthals and Denisovans met another human development line (Superarchaics) in Eurasia, which led to genetic exchange. Unfortunately, we do not know anything about the Superarchaics, fossils are not known (previously), there are only traces of their genome in the Neanderthalergenom. Perhaps they are another line of archaic homo sapiens, which emigrated to Eurasia before the Neanderthaler-Denisovaner ancestors. The superarchaics were completely displaced by Neanderthals, as later the anatomically modern person with the Neanderthaler did.
  • The anatomically modern person also emigrated to Eurasia (probably even in several approaches). There he met Neanderthaler and Denisovaner and crossed with these two lines. In the non-African populations of mankind (and in North Africa), about 1 to 2% of Neanderthalergene are still detectable. The first to prove this gene flow was Svante Päääbo, who received the Nobel Prize for Medicine or Physiology this year. Some of these genes influence e.g. skin and hair texture and may have been beneficial in the cold climate of Europe. Recently it was also discovered that one of the largest risk factors for a heavy Covid19 infection is a variant from the Neanderthaler.

In principle, modern man is “Out of Africa, there has been a certain gene flow from other human stem lines, however, even several times.

Stefan997
2 years ago

Great. Excellent description. Nice to meet someone who also knows well and writes in detail.

iqKleinerDrache
2 years ago

Science has decided: out of Africa … is right. So yes.

I have still learned East Africa, but sometimes they are no longer so sure. So Tanzania, Kenya and so.

The original skin color was brown or black… only before approx. 10000-20000 years ago the bright skin color has developed due to arable farming and lack of vitamin.

Gargamelius814
2 years ago

A skeleton was also found in the UK, where after DNA analyses it came out that this person had blue eyes and dark skin. “Cheddar Man” is also interesting