Keine Unterhaltszahlungen, aber das zweite Kind mit der neuen Frau?
Hallo, ich würde gerne Eure Meinung hören bzw lesen zu folgender Situation:
Der Vater eines Kindes ist neu verheiratet, hat mit der neuen Frau ein Kind und diese ist nun erneut schwanger. Für das Kind aus der früheren Beziehung zahlt er aber keinen Unterhalt. Offiziell bezieht er Bürgergeld, arbeitet aber sehr wahrscheinlich Vollzeit schwarz.
Wie findet ihr das dem Kind gegenüber? Ist es nicht völlig asozial, ein weiteres Kind (bewusst, nicht versehentlich) zu zeugen, wenn man keinen Unterhalt für das erste zahlt ?
(1 votes)
Loading...
The mother of the first child, or the child himself, if it is already full year, has always the possibility to give the tax office a subtle hint.
They’ll take care of it.
Asocial is to take civil money and work black.
No maintenance to pay even though you earn money too.
To have more children but not.
So if he’s lying on the state’s pocket, please dear citizens’ money recipients who are honest, don’t misunderstand. then this is a real inconsistency.
But you’re right as a mother, if you can’t care for your child, that you can help. Have you ever told the competent authorities about this?
However, you must also note that as a housewife and mother you must not rest on your child. i.e. it’s only time old enough, you can get duchaus “forced” will work parttime.
Lg, Nicki
Thank you for your answer. It’s not about me, don’t worry.
And my question primarily refers to moral depravity towards the child if the father does not pay, but puts the next child into the world.
Well, since the state obviously pays for his family, he can of course also produce other children. For child no. 1 there is a subsistence allowance if the conditions are met.
Morally speaking, it is more of the bottom drawer that he does not get the butt up to pay maintenance. But what is the question: why not? For he must do ALL to achieve the minimum maintenance. Is there any pressure on it?
If there is a suspicion that he works black, a notification should be made to the customs if the potential employer is known.
And does he care about child 1 or not?
Thanks for the answer, the child has, as far as I can, not so much interest in him and is not excessive with him or with him.
Does something positive: he doesn’t talk to her in the education and she gets money, though not from him. You want him to make a child. Only it should also take care of having its income checked every 2 years and, above all, inform the customs if black work is known.
the first child has a mother who can work to ensure maintenance. Alternatively, it can apply for a subsistence subsidy and increase the amount of citizen money. what he’s doing in a new one, she’s not going on. if he works black she must be able to prove if she can’t do it he doesn’t.
The child is well looked after by the mother, that’s not the problem. How do you see the father’s behavior towards the child?
If it concern me, and I would have been dependent on maintenance for the child, and unambiguous evidence that he would have worked black, I would blow that into the pan for black work.
but you will need to be clear in the first time and this will be very difficult
That’s what I wrote, line two fourth and fifth words…
What he does “probably” is completely irrelevant.
He has to sustain only if he is capable of doing so.
There is a subsistence fund for this. The Youth Office will inform you if it is efficient.
Hello, it’s mainly about morality towards the child, do you think you’re acting like a father?
What’s the use of morality if it’s just powerful?
No one denies that. Of course it’s not okay. But a naked man, you can’t grab the bag.
The second child with the new woman also costs a lot of money. If I don’t have money for one, why do I make another child? Everyone can get into financial trouble, that’s clear, through illness, job loss,…
The child didn’t get his birthday, but he was told that Papa was going to be Papa again. It’s not okay.