Kann man die AstreaZeneca-Impfung nicht mit anderen Ersetzen?
Trotz möglichen Hirnvenenthrombosen wurde sie nach einer Pause weiter an Risiko-Gruppen verabreicht.
Wäre es nicht besser mit anderen Gruppen zu verhandeln und diese zu verteilen, ist das nicht möglich wegen begrenzter Ressource? Ist das nicht zu Risikolastig?
PS: Ich weiss das ist freiwillig, trotzdem wird es verabreicht usw.
No one is forced to use AstraZeneca, everyone can decide freely. And at least with us, women under 60 are strictly advised.
Yes, but is still administered even if it is voluntary?
Alcohol and cigarettes are also sold, and beauty surgery is not prohibited. And none of this has a benefit for the general public and only a very small one for oneself, while they are significantly more risky than vaccination. We are mouthy beings and can decide something like that.
And Biontech and Moderna produce myocarditis in men aged 15-30 years.
The probability of this is very low. Finally, there is something to be put out on each vaccine. Whatever it is.
In many federal states, AstreaZeneca has not been allowed for women and men under 60 years
Yes, but it is still administered to risk groups or even in these age groups from 60 and above.
for which the vaccine is also less risky but even recommended
Hmm ok
the vaccine is not so risky for older people. I don’t know more than the info itself
How’s that less risky?