Which camera (and lens) would you recommend for macro photography? It doesn't have to be the most professional, so it shouldn't be too difficult to use, but the image quality should be very good.
(2 votes)
Loading...I got an old anal and flash from a friend for Christmas. He said, "Trust me, bro," so I plugged it into my camera and took a picture. Now it won't turn on anymore. What's wrong with this, and how do I fix it?
Hello, I'd like to take photos like this with my a6000. What affordable and good lenses can I buy for it?
I'm looking for the famous Canon G7X Mark II and absolutely need it before July, but it's sold out everywhere. Does anyone know where I can still get it online or maybe even in a store? That would be very nice.
We often have birds flying around our garden, and our cats often pose for photos in nice positions. Everything always looks so ugly with the phone camera. Do you know of any cameras that take good photos and aren't overly expensive? And what do you need to transfer the pictures from the camera to your…
Which is the best professional camera for photography? 8K or 4K?
Since you didn’t call a budget, here:
Canon EOS R6 Mark II from € 2875,00 (2023) | Price Comparison Geizhals Germany
Canon RF 100mm 2.8 L Macro IS USM from € 1249,99 (2023) | Price Comparison Geizhals Germany
Not the most professional camera but the quality of the pictures is very good.
Incidentally, it doesn’t matter if someone makes better or worse macro photos. Especially the person behind the camera.
There is not the camera decisive, but the lens. Actually, it does any digital camera that allows a lens change.
For example, the Tamron 2.8/90mm Macro has a quite good reputation and represents macro recordings up to 1:1. If it is to be even more, you do not come around bellows/macrotubes. For setting/focusing, a cross slide is a real help.
The depth of focus decreases very strongly in macro recordings, which is why one should deal with focus stacking. In this case, many images with slightly different focus are “completed” and give a sharp picture in the ideal case.
Do you have a brand recommendation for the camera? I personally use Canon, for example, but rather portrait photography, I heard Nikon should be very good in macro photography, do you know something about it?
I had a Canon 600d (see picture) and was very satisfied. Meanwhile I have a Sony A7r2 and it works the same way. (which has a few more benefits)
A nicon I had initially planned, but Nikon is hard to adapt manual lenses (aka: old glass), so it became the Canon, where this is very simple and inexpensive.
By the way, a 90 mm Macro lens is also a very cool portrait glass. Try it!
I have the Canon EF-100mm 1:2,8L macro with an adapter on the Canon M6 Mark 2. I’d buy that combination again. Before, I only had mirror-reflection cameras from Canon and then moved to mirrorless last year.
EF 2.8/100 is also a good recommendation!
I have no comparison now, but this is certainly a good device and costs less than half.
It’s legal for Macro recordings! That’s a lot too rare
Ah, okay, yeah 😊, but it’s tasted.
I meant the EF-100mm 1:2,8L macro proposed by you. The picture looks pretty convincing!