Ist er selber Schuld?
Ein Mann, 43, hatte Nierenkrebs.
Er ist Raucher seit mehreren Jahren.
Ist er selber Schuld?
(2 votes)
Loading...
(2 votes)Loading...
(2 votes)Loading...Similar Posts
Könnte man mich mit 20 noch einweisen?
Hi 🙋♀️ ich hab seid ich 13 bin eine Essstörung (Anorexie und Bulimie) bin jetzt 20 und jetzt gerade hab ich 11kg in 12 Wochen abgenommen da ich durch Quetiapin (was ich eingenommen habe) zugenommen habe. Ich bin 1,71m groß und wiege jetzt 66,1. Möchte aber 45-48 kg wiegen. Ich weiß, das ist ungesund und…
Wann schwere Mahlzeiten – oder nur leichte?
Ich Liebe Essen! Ich merke allerdings, je mehr ich esse, desto länger verdaue ich und ich fühle mich schlapp und erstmal nicht zu gebrauchen – was ja normal ist, Verdauung setzt nach Mahlzeit ein. Der Morgen macht ja bekanntlich den Tag, da dann faul und schlapp den Tag mit einer deftigen Mahlzeit zu starten, wäre…
Habt ihr Tipps in diesem Moment?
Hallo, tut mir Leid, dass ich so spät schreibe und ich entschuldige mich auch schon mal für die Rechtschreibung, aber es ist spät und ich habe die letzte Nacht nicht geschlafen! Die Situation ist Folgende (Ich habe ein paar Details weggelassen, um nicht von Lehrern erkannt zu werden): Im letzen Jahr hatten wir eine Lehrerin,…
Paracetamol rezeptfrei in Apotheke?
ByV3711
Kann man Paracetamol rezeptfrei in Aphotheken bekommen? Wenn ja, welche? (also 400mg, 500mg, …?) Wenn nicht, welche Schmerzmittel kann man rezeptfrei in Apotheken kaufen?
Gibt’s eine möglichkeit zu vapen ohne gesundheitlich Schäden zu bekommen?
ByHanna861
Ich möchte nur wegen dem Rauch vapen. Gibt es da etwas?
Was kann bei einem Messerstich in die leber passieren?
ByKittyOwO
stirbt mein Freund? Wie lange hat er zu leben? Kann er das überleben? Was für Auswirkungen hat das auf sein Leben?
Well, “same debt” I wouldn’t say. It is also possible that he would have been able to get cancer even without smoking, also more often people who live healthy cancer. So I think it’s too bad to say that he’s himself guilty. But it’s probably he’s wearing a co-pity.
If you consider that there are 40 different poisons in the cigarette smoke, then it can be! And smokers are mostly pleasure people who also take other things!
Another thought: Is the debt question useful? What is the consequence of this: That he deserves less compassion that he has to pay more himself? I don’t think it’s appropriate for a social society…
Finally, as others have written, the question of guilt cannot be resolved. And I would say, in doubt for the defendant. You shouldn’t treat him like he’s guilty.
Cancer can also exist in non-smokers, it depends on the type of cells affected by cancer. High blood pressure and overweight are considered the most important risk factors.
Deficient physical activity gives rise to the risk of renal cancer. A chronic renal insufficiency promotes overall and independent of its cause tumors of this organ.
Of course, smoking can also trigger kidney cancer.
The triggering factors are different.
Bone-like tumors of the kidney can start from different tissues. By far the most common are so-called kidney cell carcinomas, also referred to as kidney carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the kidney. They account for about 95 percent of all renal tumors and usually stem from the cells of urinary tracts.
In conclusion, the “debt question” is not resolved.
Google
He’s carrying a lot of cognitive. Cancer can also meet the healthiest, but the probability is, of course, much greater in such a case.
He could have increased the risk of getting kidney cancer because he smokes, so to some extent he is also blamed for it.
Sure.
LG
Yeah, but it’s also his body.
Guilt question doesn’t matter. If he would have avoided it at any price I would have advised him not to smoke
Of course.
If we were to ask Schmidti, the “No” would say. lung cancer and smoker legs e.g. B. get many who don’t smoke at all.
Yes, he is.
can still be sorry to me
Not necessarily 🤷 ♀️
We still don’t know what exactly causes cancer.
There are zig triggers. It is completely inconsistent with a decision.
It is well known which mechanisms are behind cancer, and it is also known how to minimize the risk.
No, the exact processes are not well known, otherwise you might be able to agree. That’s not the case. If someone smokes, it will be considered as a trigger first.
This is a failure, because fighting cancer is not the same as how to combat viruses or bacteria if you understand the mechanisms behind it. Since we cannot “adherently limit” biological aging (the main reason why cancer is unavoidable), we can at most try to live healthy to not drastically accelerate it. It is obvious that the kidney of the person through smoking has a much higher biological age than it should be, and accordingly he has a responsibility to bear.
Who else?
Scholz is due
Okay.