Ist dieser mazda ein gutes Auto für den Anfang?

hallo ich möchte mir bald mein ersten wagen kaufen und finde diesen mazda sehr schön aber mein vater versucht es mir auszureden und das ich nochmal schauen sollte. was meint ihr über diesen mazda als erstes auto? der tüv beim mazda ist neu und es sind noch Winterreifen dabei. das Auto hat auch keine Mängel

(2 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
25 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hunterallstar99
6 years ago

A good model. 3 pictures are of course thirsty and “the car has no deficiencies” is 100 per place 1 on the list of the largest lies in the used car(s) purchase, just right in the price range. It’s a 20-year-old car. Of course the deficiencies and if it has just been repaired, the next part is likely to occur within the next few weeks. The spare part situation has already been addressed by red sand, unfortunately is not a 80-90 Mercedes. Rust becomes a miserable subject, definitely looking – if the crispy is, a repair should not be worthwhile by far. Despite niche existence also does not have the best type of insurance class, but the costs should remain manageable, even in comparison with other cars of this class. The model care was sensible in every way, so good that you chose a late model (then EZ anyway).

Prinrx
6 years ago

Generally, they are very reliable. In old Mazdas you have to watch the rust, which are very susceptible.

olfinger
6 years ago

The age is already very high, as new deficiencies can occur every day that are not yet there.

In addition, it would be advisable to look at the car from below, there is often a lot of grate.

Unfortunately, it is not a seal for a good car when the TÜV has been refurbished, you can only be sure about the condition if you have made a picture of it yourself.

You can test him, but you should put him on stage or look at a pit to see him from below.

Such a car is advisable for a starter but only if it is really in a technically good condition. The danger you’re staying isn’t low and you’ll need a certain expertise if you don’t want to pay poorly in the workshop.

Zakalwe
6 years ago

If you like it, take it. But also consider the car is 20 years old. I wouldn’t take longer trips.

I used to have a mazda two times, but a 323. Were both great cars and reliable.

Evissima76
6 years ago

The MX 3 before 2014 (first registration) all have a very bad breakdown statistics, so I would think again. Question exactly what has already been repaired on the car – that the TÜV is new, unfortunately, does not have much to say. LG

Prinrx
6 years ago
Reply to  Evissima76

“The MX-3 before 2014”? Are you aware that the part was only built from 1991-1998?

kasimir1978
6 years ago

The Mazdas I’ve seen so far are about 22 years in the industry, all consisted of rust at the bottom. Whatever a model. So beautiful the Mazdas like to drive and otherwise might be reliable, but if you prefer to drive a car longer, look for something else. A car that drives every ass e.g.

roboboy
6 years ago
Reply to  kasimir1978

So now we’ll leave the church in the village.

There is a huge difference between a Mazda from the 90s and one from the 2000s. Around the turn of the millennium, Mazda has got the problem of moving a bit and with the newer it is no longer a problem.

I admit it was bad at the time. Nonetheless, many grate-free models from the 90s are known to me. You as a driver are also in duty to do something. Early a cavity seal and also the car regularly, as once a week wash+grown/sealed and you no longer have a big problem with the rust.

LG

kasimir1978
6 years ago
Reply to  roboboy

Mazda didn’t get in touch. A Mazda 6, which can only be driven to the scrap after 10 years, as it is in spite of underbody treatment, cannot be recommended.

roboboy
6 years ago

That’s right. However, it is no difficulty to get a better grate protection than an Astra F….

MisterMH
6 years ago

Compared to Lopez “Masterpiece”, he is already better, even better than the Cadet E or the Astra F, at least on the body side. Once saw one, he was quite yellowed, but rusty, false. The eighties, I think, were better from quality than some other generation.

roboboy
6 years ago

The Golf 2 Was well preserved?!

So he smells faster than you can say “red”….

MisterMH
6 years ago

I’m telling you, you’ll get a Golf II someday if you don’t care about it. And he was pretty well preserved.

roboboy
6 years ago

Well, it seems to be a problem. However, I only heard good, my acquaintance has not had bad experiences with Mazda. On the contrary.

It is also very important for care. When I look at the German average, it goes through the washing street once in autumn and once in spring and sucks through once a year. The Mazdas probably won’t do that well.

But I have a relative/recognized circle where a 50-year-old car has no grate approaches. I keep preaching: With the durability of cars, 90% depends on the care.

LG

kasimir1978
6 years ago

Whether before or after 2000, it doesn’t matter, only had bad experiences with Mazda. We’re lucky to have only 3 Mazda customers. Two vehicles are in the press and the third customer has picked up a new car.

MisterMH
6 years ago

Well, look what’s said in the Mazda forum.
The experience and opinions are shared in two camps, the vehicle is the Mazda, built in 2006. https://www.mazda-forum.info/threads/mazda-6-abbaujahr-2006- gibts-rostproblem.22961/

Also in various magazines I read several times that cars can have rust problems around the age.

roboboy
6 years ago

Then I really don’t know what you’ve done for your experience (or how your care has failed). Before 2000-ja, the smells very much like, you have to be really on zack.

After 2000? I don’t know a case of a blasted Mazda, and I know relatively many Mazda drivers.

mgobla
6 years ago

Does he have ABS? A car without ABS is absolutely unsuitable for starters, much too hard to control and extremely dangerous as soon as you have to strong brakes it becomes life-threatening.

In addition, you need to have such old cars checked for rust by an expert, as many are already rusty.

tobi1369
6 years ago

So I would trust your heart and take the car what’s best for you!

LG Tobi

mgobla
6 years ago
Reply to  tobi1369

Turn your brains off, great advice, if you don’t get any better, just leave it.

tobi1369
6 years ago
Reply to  mgobla

If you don’t like it, get it. ORDER LAMBO DU BIST YEAR

windydogs
6 years ago

20 years old and only 78000 kilometers on the clock….?

The present owner would have to tell me a very good story so that I believe it.

In itself, not a bad car and if that with the 78000 actually agrees at the price a bargain.

flashx83
6 years ago

have to look at Rost. My father also had a Matzda Xedos from this year. He was good but he had a lot of grate down.

rotesand
6 years ago

Hello, Nico!

Generally yes, why not —–> the MX-3 was actually good and stands on the solid basis of the legendary Mazda 323, one of the most durable compact cars ever.. he is a classic outsider but a cool grinder that does not have everyone 🙂 For this, you can certainly correct what “downwards” at the price, because this Mazda is unlikely to be asked.

The only question is whether and at what price level spare parts are to be found for the Mazda… there are older Japanese than something problematic —-> I would check best before buying, not that you get a car that is in doubt only very expensive and complex to repair and/or to supply with parts.

Also, you should take this one under the magnifying glass and rehearse it in detail. Take someone who knows well and can help you 🙂

huibuh2623
6 years ago

I find him good