Ist die Canon EOS 2000D zu empfehlen?

Auch wenn ich schon ein paar Jahre Erfahrung habe mit verschiedenen Kameras im Leben, also sprich mit 5 Kameras und unterschiedlichen Modellen, so bin ich auf der Suche nach einem Gerät neben meinem Samsung Tablet, was ich mir gestern zugelegt hatte, da ich für ein halbes Jahr oder ganzes Jahr kein neues Smartphone mehr möchte und lieber auf eine richtige Kamera Wert legen möchte für Fotografie mit Tasche und dem ganzen Rundum-Sorglos Paket.

Ich habe mir jetzt die eine Kamera mal ausgesucht weil ich sie bei dem ein oder anderen Markt für einen durchaus günstigen Preis bekommen kann und natürlich auch jederzeit offen bin für Alternativen, solange ich keine 1000€ bezahlen muss und so.

Klar, bin ich sehr vermögend, aber ich möchte es nicht mit dem Preis nicht unnötig übertreiben.

(2 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
16 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
IXXIac
1 year ago

Hello

the 2000D is technically at the stand of approx. 2008 an EOS 550D. 99% of the Canon Knips customers will be enough. The 1000 series is sold completely overpriced by Canon, but fat 3 digits of returns are now the meaning of a company.

The large image quality and speed problem of the EOS 2000D are the two EFS 18-55 DC subclass Kit Zooms to the camera. Just don’t buy garbage or combine KIT with EFS 18-55 IS STM from EFS 18-135 IS USM (which hasn’t been offered by Canon since 2020).

Samsung hasn’t produced any cameras since 2015 (more than 80 million smartphone cameras per year). The beautiful on the Galaxy System was how easy Samsung phone, camera, TV, computer networked. This is only possible with Fuji, Pentax, Olympus, Lumix, Leica, JVC, Blackmagic “comparable” elegant.

Evtl just buy a used Samsung EXF2 for tablet

http://www.chip.de/test/Samsung-EX2F-Digital Camera Test_139890012.html

FlorianH246
1 year ago

The Canons with four digits (2000 and 4000D) are the cheapest crap. Better buy a 60D o.A. for classifieds, these are usable DSLRs that are not trimmed at any corner and edge on cheap. They’re not expensive either.

ghost40
1 year ago
Reply to  FlorianH246

Does nothing, the questioner is very wealthy as he writes himself 😉

SirKermit
1 year ago

Before: even with a smartphone you can make appealing images in the sense of an image composition. But a SM has its limits in the margins of photography.

To the 2000s: the smaller the number at Canon, the better they are. With some features of the 2000D you could still live, but a pivotable display would be for me the total no-go.

Regardless of Canon: check the body to see if you can handle ergonomics and operation. It must be well in hand and the settings must be reasonable for you.

DSLR are currently cheaply used to get, but you must be aware that your time has expired, because the DSLM are what is up to now. They are further developed.

Personally, I use a Canon EOS 80D. Right big and heavy, but dust and splash water protected, as I am much outside as an enthusiastic nature photographer. It is a sturdy all-rounder, with lenses of the L series.

An EOS 80D body is sold at MPB by the 500 Euro, lenses are added. Or here https://www.dslr-forum.de/threads/canon-80d.2144942/ with battery handle.

However, my personal preference.

Otherwise, consider adding a DSLM if you really have fun. As the development progresses a lot, and especially in the field of autofocus, IBIS (stabilization of the sensor in the body) is also offered. I am quite jealous of this feature.

SirKermit
1 year ago

What was recommended to you?

SirKermit
1 year ago

I think she’s gonna be so rich.

Never underestimate such compact cameras. I have an older predecessor, who has no folding display yet and is around the 10 to 12 years old. If you are not in the boundaries of photography, you can reach something as a beginner.

Even manually, I can be hired, but that’s a little tricky.

SirKermit
1 year ago

Which one? A PowerShot https://www.mediamarkt.de/de/product/_canon-powershot-sx740-hs-2478021.html

If so, it’s okay, but without a seeker? Wouldn’t be my thing.

fanclub75
1 year ago

somehow your claim about “capacity” doesn’t match your desire to buy one of the cheapest dslr on the market.

who is so greedy, he does not buy dslr, but photogrates with a 10 year old handy from 2nd hand.

Uneternal
1 year ago

No, for the money you’re getting out for this camera, you’ll get WEIGHT better used equipment such as the EOS 70D or the 750D.

The 2000D is one of the lowest drawers plastic bombers, where everything is saved. Many functions such as automatic sensor cleaning are missing here, with old sensor technology being installed.

You’re really better off with one of the above cameras. Look at MPB.

Used Canon EOS 750D | MPB

Pialesb29
1 year ago

Has a buddy of mine the thing is an absolutely cheap plastic bomber