Similar Posts

10 Milliarden Steuergelder für 3000 Personen. Guter Deal?

ByProfiSchwurbler

Intel bekommt 10 Milliarden Euros vom Steuerzahler damit die in D ein Werk bauen (wird kein Forschungsstandort). Dort sollen dann 3000 Personen arbeiten, also Förderung über 3.3 Mio pro Arbeitsplatz. Guter Deal? Beispiel: Bei 10.000 Euro Einkommensteuer pro Jahr (45K Brutto), wäre das Geld nach 330 Jahren zurückerwirtschaftet.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TheWiseLady
TheWiseLady
3 years ago

If you want a very simplified answer: No.

The somewhat longer variant is: No, an economic model designed for unlimited growth, which includes the “financial market” can never be sustainable in a world with limited resources. However, there are also different black sheep within this rather large generic block. It’s not all Shell, BP or RWE. Green funds and securities of course have a different impact and can contribute massively to the financing of green infrastructure, sustainable corporations or products.

The detailed version can be found here: https://www.google.de/books/edition/The_decision/38JZBAAAQBAJ?hl=de&gbpv=0

2
FelixSchmelix
FelixSchmelix
3 years ago

Sure. Action costs less stomp than Netflix and chill.

However, you must also say that if you invest, it depends on which markets and shares you place your money. You can act sustainably or not.

2
BadWolf27
BadWolf27
3 years ago

No, definitely not. Only profit counts on the financial market, with no one interested in how it arises. Sustainable is different.

1
Velbert2
Velbert2
3 years ago

No, at least not in principle. You have to differentiate and look at the individual companies.

0
lesterb42
lesterb42
3 years ago

No, basically not.

2
verreisterNutzer
verreisterNutzer
3 years ago

what should be ecological about it?

Can you imagine the question again? I don’t know what you want.

0