Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
29 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fcb4livE
2 months ago

That could be seen in theory

is not enough researched how individual plastic products really affect your health.

but clear plastic avoidance is ne good idea

only glass bottles are also cleaned with brushes separating the particles remaining in the bottle

Who knows

verreisterNutzer
2 months ago

A little maybe

But not so strong

You won’t die!

rubber ball

paradies098
2 months ago

No, there is often no other way.

MenschDNA
2 months ago

So everyone can see it differently, but I find water made of glass much healthier because there is no risk for microplasitk. With us, fortunately, everything is made of glass bottles. Should the boss invest more for the benefit of his employees

Lukas1404
2 months ago

Generally, consumption of things in plastic bottles is not beneficial for health and the environment

Jo3591
2 months ago

No, because there’s no microplastics in there.

alpakka892
2 months ago

I think plasticizers are the problem here.

RubberDuck1972
2 months ago

If the bottle gets properly recycled afterwards, no problem.

Curasanus
2 months ago

Yes, micro- and nanoplastics damage health.

FreeWily
2 months ago

All that is micro is harmless

alpakka892
2 months ago
Reply to  FreeWily

Well, I’ll get some asbestos in the morning.

Are you supposed to be a satire?

FreeWily
2 months ago
Reply to  alpakka892

Asbestos is carcinogenic you smurf

alpakka892
2 months ago

I kind of feel like I’m just holding up with a 15-year-old gang that’s fun with me.

FreeWily
2 months ago

Biology basics. Were you out of school?

alpakka892
2 months ago

I understand your short thought, only he does not.

The definition of micro to the name is quite stupid.

FreeWily
2 months ago

Think about boy. This is not so difficult to understand

alpakka892
2 months ago

That’s the exact opposite of logical, but hey.

FreeWily
2 months ago

Harmful. It’s logical

alpakka892
2 months ago

to be what? Real? That’s bullshit. Don’t you believe in bacteria and viruses?

FreeWily
2 months ago

Because micro is too small

alpakka892
2 months ago

Yes, the statement itself is very easy to understand. I’m interested in this, let’s say, extraordinary opinion.

Because that’s all the foundation.

FreeWily
2 months ago

It’s easy to understand. Everything that carries micro in the name is bicht harmful

alpakka892
2 months ago

With the opinion, you are quite alone in the far corridor and have to ignore a lot.

Is that because you can’t just see such things? So according to the motto: Did I not see myself I don’t think?

I want to understand.

FreeWily
2 months ago

I’m so

alpakka892
2 months ago

How blunt is that?

Well, that would also mean that all microorganisms would be completely harmless.

FreeWily
2 months ago

No. It must be in the name.

alpakka892
2 months ago

Oh, it must be in your name, right?
Size doesn’t matter?
Asbestos fibres are typically between 0.5 and 10 micrometers long.

More micro is hardly possible.

FreeWily
2 months ago

Where are you reading micro in asbestos?

alpakka892
2 months ago

Oh, well, hold on, too. You Gargamel