Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
12 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rheinflip
1 year ago

Yes, these are rich people with access to the means of production. They can decide the fate of 100,000 people at any time.

Rheinflip
1 year ago
Reply to  Dontlikeputin

I don't know if that's as decadent and perverse as life itself.

bergquelle72
1 year ago
Reply to  Rheinflip

Wollte der Fragesteller dies wissen ?

Rheinflip
1 year ago
Reply to  bergquelle72

Hier geht’s um die Definition von Reichtum. Darf man jetzt reiche nicht mehr mehr Reiche nennen

bergquelle72
1 year ago

HUH? He's asking if that's "true" wealth? Is that supposed to be the question about the definition of wealth?

According to Wikipedia, "wealth" does not have a universally accepted definition: " Wealth refers to the abundance of material or spiritual values. However, there is no universally accepted definition, since the concept of wealth depends on culturally influenced, subjective , and sometimes highly emotional or normative values ."

bergquelle72
1 year ago

No, that is false wealth.

Thanks for the numbers….did you also want to know something?

because of "Good question" and so on

bergquelle72
1 year ago
Reply to  Dontlikeputin

Meine “Antwort” paßt zu deiner “Frage” ….

sie hat die gleiche Qualität.

bergquelle72
1 year ago
Reply to  bergquelle72

zu deiner Zusatzfrage: nein, sind wir nicht. – bei weitem nicht.

bergquelle72
1 year ago

Wenn du das weißt, warum fragst du dann ?

Bist du nur hier um Aufmerksamkeit zu bekommen, oder kapierst du das Konzept einer Frage nicht?