Is this logic of Chat GPT correct?
How can Chat GPT admit a mistake but repeat the statement?
How can Chat GPT admit a mistake but repeat the statement?
Hello, I look forward to your answers. I studied architecture abroad and have been working as an administrative assistant in an office near where I live for a year. However, I live in a small town, and it's difficult to find a job in architecture quickly, as I don't work in that field. Since I…
So, I mostly use Discord on my phone, and since this morning, my microphone, camera, and picture functions have somehow disappeared. It says "allow Discord access to your photos," and then I'm taken to the settings, but I can't do anything there. Does anyone know how I can get these functions back and allow Discord…
I'd like to create my own very simple shortcut for a command like switching to energy saving mode, using a shortcut I've suggested myself. So, one that's not already in use, of course. It would be great if someone could help me with this or point me to a good website/video, because I can't find…
I added too many people. I was stupid and bored. Now I have too many pending requests. How can I remove them all at once?
Hello, is there a website other than Pastebin, with the Hastebin design, that doesn't delete entries? So, it keeps them forever? Thanks.
My videos look like this, too. They either don't extend to the edge and the image is much smaller, or the video is shifted downwards or upwards. Why is this? I always adjust everything correctly.
I would not really call Chat GPT “intelligent”.
Chat GPT sometimes fails in simplest logic and mathematics tasks.
It is more like seeing a kind of language model that tries to answer your questions/tasks with the help of stored data and the one you have written, in a way that would possibly also write a person. Chat GPT does not really understand the data, but rather looks like the data in its database. [Also in what contexts the data has occurred and have been queried.]
In the specific case, Chat GPT has probably recognized your “can’t be but not” and realizes that in such cases it is usually apologised for a mistake. Therefore the “voice, that was my mistake.” And possibly Chat GPT avoids the word “simultaneously” in its formulation because of the “not at the same time” you mentioned. Nevertheless, in his database “Bern” is somehow connected to “Capital City of Switzerland” and “Federal City of Switzerland”, so Chat GPT is once again coming to the same assertion as before (just re-formulated).
You should not rely on the correctness of the statements mentioned by Chat GPT. You should always think about yourself if that really fits. [In some areas, such as combining texts, Chat GPT is more suitable due to its being. You have to look less closely. But especially in mathematics and related areas such as logic, physics, etc., one must always look very closely at what Chat GPT actually gives for nonsense.]
👍🏻
ChatGPT is just too polite, or never writes anything that can be insultingly revealed. Actually, you should have pointed out that your question is stupid.
Aunt Ädith told me that you wrote a federal city and not a state. And then, of course, the thing is different. This would not have allowed the 2nd “Voices You are Right” to write because that is indeed incorrect. Of course, the city can have both characteristics.
But courtesy must not have priority over correctness?
The answer of CatGPT is corect
What does it say, what is incorrect? Your questions imply that you mean the other name carrier. To this end, it also explicitly indicates that the canton as well as the city bear the name.
Therefore, no, the errors in the conclusion lie with you for me.
I’ve edited my answer, I’m about to share on his side.
That’s 5D Chess
It is a well-known manko that AI fails at the inversion.
Your question about ChatGPT provokes a necessary logic reversal from the AI.
Why are you surprised?
Because the thing gets a mistake, but the mistake is repeated again.
AI talks a lot of garbage. I have observed this behavior very often. So not exceptional.
So there’s no intelligence behind it?
But there’s intelligence behind it, it’s just not so advanced.
Mihisu made the effort to explain.
Where do you recognize intelligence?