Is it wrong to use Chatgpt to write stories?

So he doesn't write the stories; I give him what I wrote and tell him to write it better and find mistakes. And sometimes I get inspired, and sometimes I stick with my version.

I publish the stories, too. Is that somehow cheating? He's just assisting me.

(2 votes)
Loading...

Similar Posts

Subscribe
Notify of
50 Answers
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kleineAmeise4
1 year ago

I don’t think it’s probable, but I think the Ki won’t really help you. The AI “white” not anything about grammar, sentence construction or writing style. Nor can she really create new ideas. The Ki doesn’t show you all the mistakes in your lyrics and can possibly make you feel right things as wrong.

In addition, there could be problems with copyright. You may no longer own this as soon as you enter your text into the Ki (you can read in the guidelines of the corresponding Ki, I have heard it as a warning from other authors)

I don’t think it’s cheating as long as you’re honest.

ruhrgur
1 year ago

In my opinion, it is unethical if you have a text created by an AI and do not recognize it accordingly.

To get you from an AI ideas and to use them as a support in the writing process, I find perfectly acceptable, but let an AI create the ultimate work? Apart from the fact that there is usually nothing very good at getting out anyway, this would also be unethical (and meaningless; let me tell about ChatGPT a story myself, why should I then want to read a finished one).

LG

ruhrgur
1 year ago
Reply to  shadowdash

Then you don’t seem to have understood my point: picking up ideas from the AI and then writing yourself is okay, writing yourself and then not using an AI as a tool.

If you’re dissatisfied with your sentence building, work on it – only through exercise you get better. If I read something, then because a person created it. Simply reading a text from a Large Language model is first boring (because you can also recognize the set design of ChatGPT) and secondly nothing more special.

Koala500
1 year ago

No. But it’s good. And if you write more, it’ll be better. Stop being so desperate. No one can be perfect and you don’t want to think that if you don’t get the letter you’re completely useless. Stories are not all that your personality is and what is important.

You mean write what? Well, then write, try, have fun. But don’t force yourself. Don’t think your life is unnecessary if you don’t become a really good author. Don’t make your worth the quality of your stories. (Also if your stories are good xD)

Koala500
1 year ago

It’s nothing rough

ruhrgur
1 year ago

although there were phases where I sat on a chapter for 8 hours

Eight hours are not much. Depending on the genre and extent of the planned font, you should plan a week of working time for a chapter. I personally write for example when I work on a role game adventure incl. Drawings and structuring around a month on a chapter and often reworked this later.

If you were to read something from me, you would understand me directly and ANFLEHEN to rework my texts with an AI

No, I would never. In any case, I would recommend you to use a spelling program (Word or Libre Writer are sufficient here).

No one expects you to be perfect and only mistakes will make you smart. If you don’t make any mistakes and instantly raise the point that you can’t write well anyway, you won’t be better in the long term. A successful learning process always consists of a theoretical part, a practical part and feedback.

I therefore stopped writing for a week, because of minority complexes.

As already said: Exercise makes the Master. If you want to improve in writing, then the only sensible way to do this is to write regularly. For example, as a small exercise, you could theoretically deal with a text type (short stories are well suited here) and then write a text of this kind for 1-3 months each week, which contains at least five words that you can spit out from a random generator.

ruhrgur
1 year ago

I think you haven’t read the end.

If you’re going to write directly with this attitude, you don’t have to wonder if you don’t make any progress…

FelixSH
1 year ago

But that’s how you get better. Writing is a craft, you get better with exercise. Even though it’s bad at the beginning, you’ll make progress when you put the work in (and try something new again and again).

Koala500
1 year ago

Stop it! Is a good alternative!!!

ruhrgur
1 year ago

ChatGPT can be used for example To give ideas to generate random words that you want to integrate into a chapter, etc., but not for more, otherwise the end product is no longer from you. ChatGPT is not a editor.

Give0a0hand
1 year ago

When it comes to formulation and co, you can also use deeplWrite.

Silberfeder972
1 year ago

For me, that would be nothing, and I also think that you should definitely characterize it. You don’t have false feathers, and you’ll be praised for something you didn’t do. It’s embarrassing when it comes out, because there are people who can see if a text is from you or from someone else.

As a real author, this is the most beautiful thing in writing. You can get a tip or ask for a little correction… But then that was.

You put yourself in front of J.K.Rowling would have done this and that would have come out sometime… that would be an absolute scandal!

Silberfeder972
1 year ago
Reply to  shadowdash

You could be right. I just got my first novel out. I think that might create 1 person a year of thousands (so to become known as J.K.Rowling.) But I write because it’s fun for me.

Fuchssprung
1 year ago

That’s exactly what I do. I do not use texts from ChatGPT, but use the tool for my research, error correction and inspiration. Sometimes good things come out. Texts can’t do this thing. That’s not my style, and that would make every reader notice.

FelixSH
1 year ago

only sentence building, grammar, formulating, vocabulary and so on,

But these are the things that make up an author. That’s exactly what you should take, that’s your voice, that pretends to be sentenced and vocabulary.

If you need alternative words, ask for it, or use a thesaurus. But what word you use should you decide.

Precise construction is essential to a writer. Not only, but it’s an important part that identifies you.

You can check grammar, that’s just a regular. And sometimes the breaking of grammar rules can create interesting style, but only by the way.

I would even suggest ideas. Ideas are cheap. Interesting is the preparation.

Tichuspieler
1 year ago
Reply to  shadowdash

. I rework my texts several times before I publish them, and I am happy.

And there we have him, Knausus Knacktus, the point where so many authors are desperate: the desire for the perfect text.
I have a bad info for you first: there is no perfection. Perfection is an illusion. How to define this term?

And now I’ll give you another one (at least a nasty mopp): Even if DIR does not admit your written text because you have a claim to you that you cannot reach (because you always find a hair in your “soup”): The reader decides whether he likes a text or not.

And because you write that you have only been “critized” by inexperienced readers (or your text), then log in to a forum where even writers can roast other texts and make their own texts roast. To the quick I have the side http://www.federteufel.de I found, but I just looked voluntarily.

I think it is good, right and important that you take the writing seriously and that you want to give your stories the appreciation and respect they have for you. That’s why it’s also good that you’ve reworked history several times. But at some point, you’ll reach a point where you’ll only get worse.
And now I ask you and ask you for an honest answer – even to you: Is it better to write a story as good as possible, even if it may not correspond to how you would like it, but it has seen the light of the world and you make some readers a pleasure because they have been talking to the protas, or do you prefer to write a story from which you finally, finally, finally, have thought so well?

I’m Advocatus Diabolus again: You write a “perfect” story, you publish it, some people read it and that was it then. It is consumed and finished. Honestly, investing so much time?

I also have such a baby, a heart project, a novel that I really want to write well. And I also hang in there. But even to a certain point. And then there are two possibilities: It likes the reader, or he doesn’t like it.
After reading it, he goes to the next novel. Point.

Koala500
1 year ago
Reply to  shadowdash

🙄 practice? You sound VERDAMMT NOCHEINMAL GUT OR NOT! No, not perfect as a book. But that’ll be sometime. And then is a good text to write a perfect start.

FelixSH
1 year ago

Yeah, take time. Don’t go tomorrow. And self-criticism is part of art, you like to be self-critical.

You can use ChatGPT, but then you’ll never get better, and it won’t really be from you, not your voice. You never become an author, at least not a good one. Authors often work on a good book for years. They can work on one side a day. It takes time. But if you use ChatGPT for such essential things as phrase building and word choice, you won’t be better.

Eortner
1 year ago

I do it sometimes like you, but I would never incorporate whole texts from AI into my novel

seppon
1 year ago

It might work for a novel. But for a scientific work ChatGPT is not to be used.

Koala500
1 year ago

Jap. I don’t think so. Only if you write big about the chat is “inspired”.

At home exercises it is still okay, but otherwise as “art” or hobby it is NOT okay.

Koala500
1 year ago
Reply to  shadowdash

Yeah, it’s like my parents would look at it again… not all yours anymore.

Koala500
1 year ago

Jap. I think you should let people read about it, and then find a solution yourself. Or a program that shows you error, but not corrected. That’s okay.

Koala500
1 year ago

I know what it means to you. But if you work with chatgpt, it is not your work anymore

Koala500
1 year ago

No, it’s not a pleasure to discuss. I’d rather talk to nice people.

Koala500
1 year ago

🙄😂

Koala500
1 year ago

🙄

Koala500
1 year ago

Yeah, just do, you do anyway. I don’t think it’s good.

Nordseefan
1 year ago

So you’re practically using it as a editor?

I’m fine.

But observing, also CHatGTP tapped sometimes mixed

MarSusMar
1 year ago

From your headline.

So he doesn’t write the layers, I give him what I wrote

You are coming

I do not take text passages 1 to 1. Can no one read here?!

You obviously don’t have your text. That’s the AI garbage.