I do not quite understand your question, but I am interpreting that there are jobs that are of great interest to many.
About oral propaganda, experiences, etc., it is always that many interest in such jobs.
On the other hand, when you read the description of the activity and visualize it, many are afraid of it and do not apply for such places.
I believe, from an experience, that it actually lies with the worker himself. There are activities to which no one really tries to get them because they have an opinion on what it is doing. Then there are those who try and find out that they like to do it.
What I always find is that many are working for jobs, although they do not live up to their skills in retrospect, but the workplace might just want to earn more money or because the work is clean, but they may be bored or feel unstressed, or the skills are just enough for the most necessary and not beyond.
Sometimes workers don't want to make shifts and look for some work without shift, whether it suits their skills. Some may be shy of work in production, but this only happens occasionally.
As you see, there are various reasons why many apply to a job and vice versa. Jobs that will be avoided.
But in the end, of course, everyone should decide for themselves. I don't think the salary should be in the foreground, but whether you're enjoying the work. Some people don't care, they just want the money or the simple one. Everyone likes him.
And then there are still jobs that are good, but will be avoided because the wage group is lower. That would also be a reason why some jobs are not so interesting.
It's up to the point. I changed in January and was the first applicant for two years. In the second position that would have been in question, I know those are still looking today.
Yes. However, I can burn about 95% of these applications because not even nutritionally the qualification is given. Main students with a 4 degree and without training apply for example as head of staff, or marketing.
I do not quite understand your question, but I am interpreting that there are jobs that are of great interest to many.
About oral propaganda, experiences, etc., it is always that many interest in such jobs.
On the other hand, when you read the description of the activity and visualize it, many are afraid of it and do not apply for such places.
I believe, from an experience, that it actually lies with the worker himself. There are activities to which no one really tries to get them because they have an opinion on what it is doing. Then there are those who try and find out that they like to do it.
What I always find is that many are working for jobs, although they do not live up to their skills in retrospect, but the workplace might just want to earn more money or because the work is clean, but they may be bored or feel unstressed, or the skills are just enough for the most necessary and not beyond.
Sometimes workers don't want to make shifts and look for some work without shift, whether it suits their skills. Some may be shy of work in production, but this only happens occasionally.
As you see, there are various reasons why many apply to a job and vice versa. Jobs that will be avoided.
But in the end, of course, everyone should decide for themselves. I don't think the salary should be in the foreground, but whether you're enjoying the work. Some people don't care, they just want the money or the simple one. Everyone likes him.
And then there are still jobs that are good, but will be avoided because the wage group is lower. That would also be a reason why some jobs are not so interesting.
It's up to the point. I changed in January and was the first applicant for two years. In the second position that would have been in question, I know those are still looking today.
This depends significantly on the job. Private school teacher – hardly applicants. Policy – many applicants
Incidentally, the company is also involved. Small family business – less. Established company such as Siemens – more
Yes. However, I can burn about 95% of these applications because not even nutritionally the qualification is given. Main students with a 4 degree and without training apply for example as head of staff, or marketing.
Isn't it still uneasy?
I corrected my question grammatically. In the application process, this question is already important to learn labor market changes.
This is certainly not a correct German. But I didn't mean that either. I said inaccurate, not incorrect.