Well, on the one hand, it's probably in your school contract that you signed that you wouldn't do that and then the contract would be broken, otherwise it would be, as a math work is an academic achievement, a fake. Both not necessarily beautiful crimes.
Well, you probably don't threaten any legal consequences, but it's not that allowed…
You should bear in mind that teachers are not stupid (usually) and the likelihood of flying far higher than zero. Keep in mind the following: if this happens, you will get a 6. And you've got a note that's better than 6. Good luck!
Good, but the breach of contract can still be seen as a breach of duty and that can be carried out in court. If nobody's gonna do it, it'll be possible. This becomes worse if you don't give false oaths, but what schools below universities are rather inappropriate, for which the Criminal Code provides for a fine of up to three years.
It's not even known how old the FS is here. The word "mathework" alone suggests that it is a school-aged person under 18 years of age. He's never signed it! There are sanctions in the school system and that was so easy years away from any crime.
I can't even recognize in the wildest scenarios unfairly. cheating on a math work either flies up and is directly punished as a "true attempt" with a bad note or a failure attempt at an exam, or it does not fall up and the cheater is lucky.
We are not talking about fake dissertations, which can only come to light later and whose scope is much greater.
If it's bad, you could also say that you want to acquire an unlawful asset advantage through fake academic achievements by fooling someone. This would then be ยง 263 in the StGB and for that there are up to five years imprisonment.
This, too, is not going to happen to anyone at a school, but would not be completely excluded.
This is an excellent method to get the work subsequently rated insufficiently. So courage to risk!
By the way, I am for the same right for all. If the pupil is allowed to cheat, then the teacher may be cheating. That would make the correction much easier.
I think the desk response is "no". But what kind of consequences could happen is certainly not insignificantly dependent on what you understand under "stumble."
To put the neighbor on the notebook is something different from getting the solutions by smartphone from someone who puts them on the toilet.
Well, on the one hand, it's probably in your school contract that you signed that you wouldn't do that and then the contract would be broken, otherwise it would be, as a math work is an academic achievement, a fake. Both not necessarily beautiful crimes.
Well, you probably don't threaten any legal consequences, but it's not that allowed…
You should bear in mind that teachers are not stupid (usually) and the likelihood of flying far higher than zero. Keep in mind the following: if this happens, you will get a 6. And you've got a note that's better than 6. Good luck!
A breach of contract is not a crime, but a civil problem. And a document won't be counterfeit.
You're allowed to cheat completely free of punishment. And get a nice 6. You're not in court.
Good, but the breach of contract can still be seen as a breach of duty and that can be carried out in court. If nobody's gonna do it, it'll be possible. This becomes worse if you don't give false oaths, but what schools below universities are rather inappropriate, for which the Criminal Code provides for a fine of up to three years.
You're right.
This is all extremely far brought!
It's not even known how old the FS is here. The word "mathework" alone suggests that it is a school-aged person under 18 years of age. He's never signed it! There are sanctions in the school system and that was so easy years away from any crime.
I can't even recognize in the wildest scenarios unfairly. cheating on a math work either flies up and is directly punished as a "true attempt" with a bad note or a failure attempt at an exam, or it does not fall up and the cheater is lucky.
We are not talking about fake dissertations, which can only come to light later and whose scope is much greater.
If it's bad, you could also say that you want to acquire an unlawful asset advantage through fake academic achievements by fooling someone. This would then be ยง 263 in the StGB and for that there are up to five years imprisonment.
This, too, is not going to happen to anyone at a school, but would not be completely excluded.
Yes, if you accept, then get a six. ๐
-What nobody knows doesn't make anyone hot-
-Everything is legal as long as nobody sees…
But if you go according to the rules then no.
Whether you're trying it is with you.
The second sentence is not true…
Why? If anyone never knows (apart from oneself) what do others want to do?
Well, it may be nice as a saying, but it's not true.
You don't know that spell, can that be?
It is, of course, not legal, but you simply have no one who sanctions it.
This is an excellent method to get the work subsequently rated insufficiently. So courage to risk!
By the way, I am for the same right for all. If the pupil is allowed to cheat, then the teacher may be cheating. That would make the correction much easier.
No,
I think the desk response is "no". But what kind of consequences could happen is certainly not insignificantly dependent on what you understand under "stumble."
To put the neighbor on the notebook is something different from getting the solutions by smartphone from someone who puts them on the toilet.
Sura. Don't let yourself get caught.
Yeah.