Similar Posts
"Will bite" in Russian?
Hello, for school I need to know how to say "will bite" in Russian. There's a "will" (budu -> pronunciation). It actually comes before the verb, but I'm not sure about this. Please help! Kind regards
Good UV flashlights?
Which good black light flashlights are available on Amazon with 365nm or lower for under 25 euros?
Is smoking also harmful to fish?
They don't have lungs.
What type of bird?
What species of bird is this? I would be very interested to know.
Is the crypto guy serious?
ByinvestMe
Or like the guy who has to go to jail now, who was exposed by Tristan Tate They all look so nerdy https://www.instagram.com/reel/CouVbuJDuvm/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= Sam bank man I mean https://youtube.com/shorts/v8onkBN9J6Q?feature=share
Resize table column to fit content-html?
Hello, I've been trying this table for days now, and it just doesn't work. I want the column with "Image" to be not as wide, but roughly the same width as the image itself. If I make the image larger it is the same size, then I make the image smaller with width and the…
Evolution is not a learning process, because it happens unconsciously, randomly and in contrast to the adaptation of more numerous generations.
Most learning is unconscious. Most of the things we learn as a baby and toddler by trying. There’s no child saying, I want to learn how to run.
That’s why a “and” and no “or”.
No!
Learning presupposes that the result of a process is stored somewhere in order to be able to apply it the next time.
If, in a foreign language, I suggest a new vocabulary for a situation that I have not yet had, and then actually learn, then I will remember in the next comparable situation, and do not have to re-examine how to express it. Perhaps I have learned a vocabulary that does not correspond to the starting word 1:1, but only under certain conditions, then I will make the same mistake again and again in the future.
If there is a species of animal on a bare, cold island with low food supply, then a read-out process will take place, the result of which can be seen a bit far foreseeable: those with a lower food requirement and a longer coat could have the better maps, the newly created species could differ from the original in these points. Maybe the longer coat would have all a very striking color, which leads to completely new problems with fress enemies… In any case, nature has found a new, more or less suitable “Vokabel” for the new situation. But if after a few hundred thousand years a similar case occurs again, a few will land on a similar island, then no one will remember what solution was found at that time, but it will again develop a completely new solution, perhaps similar to in the first case, but perhaps also quite different…
Evolution goes on a whole.
From the perspective of evolution is learned from mistakes. However, it is not enough that an individual has learned something, but this improved adaptation must be genetically manifested and ultimately enforced by displacement of the “unlearned” individuals.
However, if one understands the term “learning” far enough, one can say that there is always a learning event at the beginning of an evolutionary process (except in mutations).
No, it’s not.
Evolution is random and pure try & error. New properties result from genetic defects. If these are good, one survives and the defect spreads through descendants, and if not one dies and thus the defect disappears again. And that goes on forever. The ones with the good gene defect get new gene defects, which are good or bad again, etc.
Even better answer than that of noname68
But Trial & Error is “learning”?
Only do not relate to a single individual, but to a whole kind. Thus “learns” the way.
So in computer science (K.I.) you can understand how to learn “trial and error”. 😀
From the point of view of a “global living being earth” yes: she notices what didn’t work. Their biological memory is the survivors.
In other considerations rather no: Evolution is chaos and survival of the randomly better equipped or randomly also the badly equipped.
The answer therefore lies in the way of consideration.
Evolu
/Evolutión/
Noun, feminine [they]
Origin
Latin evolutio = the strike (one book), to: evolvere, evolve
Source: wiki
Now answer the question.
No, because the beings do not decide to change their characteristics.
Beings evolve in the course of evolution, resulting in random and undirected mutations of the individuals of a population that cause a certain variability of their characteristics. In sexually propagating living beings there is also recombination, i.e. the redistribution of the genes of the parents in their descendants, which leads to new combinations of features.
Those individuals who, by chance, are slightly better adapted to the environmental conditions prevailing in their habitat than the others, tend to have a longer life and/or better chances of finding sexual partners, which leads to them having a little more offspring. That’s called selection.
When this happens again and again, the beneficial characteristics gradually prevail in the population, so the percentage of individuals with these characteristics increases in the population. At some point, then perhaps all individuals of the population have these characteristics, which are then called fixed. Thus, if the individuals of the population differ sufficiently from their ancestors, one can speak of a new kind.
In addition, there are other evolutionary factors such as gene drift, i.e. the random change not taking place by selection, the frequencies of characteristics in a population, and isolation, which denotes the division of an original population into several subpopulations. But they all take place unconsciously.
you can also learn with the “try & error” method that uses nut nature in the evolution.
the “learning” is not reflected in knowledge, but in characteristics and adaptations of living beings.
I find a suitable answer.
I also, try & error would have been my answer — in addition, I would like to say that, precisely because of try&error, it is rather a random process than a learning process … (the error from try&error is annoyed several times)
Evolution itself is not a learning process.
But it involves learning processes of living beings.
Best regards
gregor443
No. Evolution is change over time. This can also mean a process of forgetting.
Somehow, but with the small limitation that there is only 1 or 0 for a decision.
If the decision was correct, you’ll survive. If the decision was not quite optimal, then the evolutionary strand tears and others occupy your place.