Is being only in contrast to nothingness?
(1 rating, 1 votes, rated)You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...
(1 rating, 1 votes, rated)You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...
(1 rating, 1 votes, rated)You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...
Very philosophically and logically, exactly that.
Let's say we know it would be. Existence. Then black would be nothing. The counterpart (contrast) to it.
Even if you can't visualize anything easily, you'd understand.
It's not about being something, but being pure. So big written.
Question re-formulated (with visualization? Is there white because black?
No.
So without the question, you'd experience that. You'd be white
But since we are people in this world we know about both
Light and Darkness
I think if you're a fly and only you know, you'll never ask yourself if it can be dark
That's too much spectrum for me. This goes towards Hegel and so on.
I'm more like Kant.
I see what I see.
No.
Like what. seeing at a table is being with its negation, so nothing. The table isn't a plant, so it's not.
I've never seen THE NOT or THE NO.