Elementary particles can only be described by their interaction properties, such as mass and charge. At the same time, due to the uncertainty principle, they don't have a precisely defined size and shape. How, in your opinion, could one then answer the question of what elementary particles actually are? Or does the question perhaps not even make sense? 🤔🤔🤔
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading...Sunrise, sunset and culmination time
Hello, As the cross-sectional area of a conductor increases, its resistance decreases. Can this be described as a negative correlation?
Are the tubes slightly rounded or what?
If a lamp is connected to L1 and N and PE and the phase of an insulation fault would put the housing under voltage. The voltage would flow back via PE. My question; Does current still flow back through N or does the RCD trip immediately? Or only when I touch it with my hands
Hey My sister doesn't understand a physics problem. The problem is that I've never taken physics myself and therefore can't help her. Does anyone know the solution??
Hello, I have these two circuits. I've calculated the total resistance and total voltage of both. Now, the total voltage and resistance in circuit 1 are twice as high (4V, 10 ohms) as in circuit 2 (2V, 5 ohms). Does this mean that they don't behave equivalently with respect to terminals AB, or does it…
just?
mass, spin, parity, electric charge, color charge, weak isospine, flavour, decay width, …
What else do you want?
I don’t see how this is supposed to have anything to do with blur relation.
all fundamental particles are today considered as spot particles without internal structure. simply because there is no indication of the opposite.
the excitations of the associated field (such as the electromagnetic field).
Yeah, that’s a very abstract thing. but so it is (after today the dinge stood)
There are three reasons why you think it is. But that was also helpful, so the answer, really thank you! 👏🏻
Size and shape are properties of macroscopic objects, not of elementary particles. This has nothing to do with location/pulse blur.
And what do you think is elementary particles? Does the question make sense? 🤔
Elementary particles are elementary particles. This is the meaning of “elementary” – there is no classification behind it, unless one follows the string theory, but any supersymmetry above the standard model is even more abstract than the model, and even further away from household objects and building market snacks.
Can you finally justify these in 3 sentences? Why it has nothing to do with location and impulse/blur, and the size and shape of the microscopic objects are in your opinion ? Would really be very helpful… 🤯
Thank you again! 👏🏻 Found something like this:Elemental particlesis called indivisible, subatomic particles, which act as the smallest building blocks of matter and as “trans mediators” of interactions. 🤔